Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for CPRE Hertfordshire search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

WY1 Land south of Little Wymondley

Representation ID: 6176

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to WY1: (see reps on para 4.53, SP8 and SP14-19) - development unsound, not consistent with NPPF, no exceptional circumstances that justify removal. Development would cause significant harm.


Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

BK3 Land between Cambridge Road and Royston Road

Representation ID: 6189

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to BK3: harmful impact on countryside, contrary to national policy, excessive scale in terms of size and character, unsustainable - employment, services and private vehicle.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

RD1 Land at Blacksmiths Lane

Representation ID: 6190

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to RD1: Harmful impact on the countryside contrary to national policy - no justification.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

RY10 Land south of Newmarket Road

Representation ID: 6191

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to RY10: Harmful impact on the countryside contrary to national policy - no justification.


Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

SP2 Land beween Horn Hill and Bendish Lane, Whitwell

Representation ID: 6192

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to SP2: Harmful impact on the countryside contrary to national policy - no justification. Excessive scale in size and character of the village, unsustainable location - employment, services and private vehicles.


Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Baldock

Representation ID: 6197

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to amended Green Belt boundary (see comment on para 6.26) from current established position solely because there is an equally or more defensible location elsewhere is contrary to national green belt policy. Significant harm to GB and purposes

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Cockernhoe and east of Luton

Representation ID: 6198

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to amended Green Belt boundary (see comment on para 6.26) from current established position solely because there is an equally or more defensible location elsewhere is contrary to national green belt policy. Significant harm to GB and purposes

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Graveley & North of Stevenage

Representation ID: 6199

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to amended Green Belt boundary (see comment on para 6.26) from current established position solely because there is an equally or more defensible location elsewhere is contrary to national green belt policy. Significant harm to GB and purposes

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Hitchin

Representation ID: 6200

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to amended Green Belt boundary (see comment on para 6.26) from current established position solely because there is an equally or more defensible location elsewhere is contrary to national green belt policy. Significant harm to GB and purposes

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Kings Walden

Representation ID: 6201

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to amended Green Belt boundary (see comment on para 6.26) from current established position solely because there is an equally or more defensible location elsewhere is contrary to national green belt policy. Significant harm to GB and purposes

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.