Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 6085

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to GA2 (and supporting text): No exceptional circumstances, misinterpretation of NPPF policy, significant adverse impact on GB purposes not adequately addressed in plan or evidence.

Object

Representation ID: 6088

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to EL1, 2 and 3 (and supporting text): No exceptional circumstances, misinterpretation of NPPF policy, significant adverse impact on GB purposes not adequately addressed in plan or evidence, are included in AONB expansion, important landscape, due weight not given to conflict with GB purposes, Luton urban capacity increased - no exceptional need.

Object

Representation ID: 6089

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to ETC1 (and supporting text) - protection of all employment land is not consistent with permitted development rights, source of windfall sites, plan should encourage the use or redevelopment of suitably located employment sites for housing where does not adversely affect current owners and occupiers.

Object

Representation ID: 6145

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to ETC2 (and para 5.9 and 5.10) - second para of policy not consistent with permitted development rights, employment sites provide source of windfall sites, plan should encourage the use or redevelopment of suitably located employment sites for housing where does not adversely affect current owners and occupiers.

Object

Representation ID: 6146

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to CGB2 (and para 6.11) - Lack of definition when site covered or not, interpretation of "adjoining category A village" / "within a category C village" / "beyond built core" / "other relevant study" open to interpretation unless explained in supporting text.
Object to final para in relation to market housing in the Green Belt which is contrary to the NPPF.

Object

Representation ID: 6147

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Proposals Map and para 6.26 - Proposal to move GB boundaries from current long established position solely because there is an equally or more defensible location elsewhere is contrary to National GB policy. Reasoning not exceptional circumstances

Object

Representation ID: 6148

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to HS1 and para 8.1 - Housing target of 15,950 is unsound (see SP8 and Chapter 4 comments)

Object

Representation ID: 6149

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Support policy although for purposes of clarity the final sentence of part 'f' could be amended to state that the proposed mitigation should "to the satisfaction of the local planning authority in consultation with the Chilterns Conservation Board"

Object

Representation ID: 6151

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to BA2: (see reps on para 4.53, SP8 and SP14-19) - development unsound, not consistent with NPPF, no exceptional circumstances that justify removal. Development would cause significant harm.

Object

Representation ID: 6152

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to BA3 (see reps on para 5.53, SP8 and SP14-19) - development unsound, not consistent with NPPF, no exceptional circumstances that justify removal. Development would cause significant harm.