Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Rumball Sedgwick search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy ETC5: Secondary Shopping Frontages

Representation ID: 6107

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ETC5: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy ETC6: Local Centres

Representation ID: 6108

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ETC6: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy ETC7: Scattered local shops and services in towns and villages

Representation ID: 6109

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ETC7: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt

Representation ID: 6110

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to SP5: Green Belt type-controls imposed in non Green Belt areas, presumption against development

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy CGB1: Rural Areas beyond the Green Belt

Representation ID: 6111

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to CGB1: Imposition of restrictive Green Belt-type controls in the rural areas, indistinguishable from Green Belt policy

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy CGB2: Exception sites in rural areas

Representation ID: 6112

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to CGB2: Unnecessarily duplicates national policy

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy CGB3: Rural Workers' Dwellings

Representation ID: 6113

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to CGB3: unnecessarily duplicates national policy

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy CGB4: Existing rural buildings

Representation ID: 6114

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to CGB4: unnecessarily duplicates national policy, overtaken by permitted development rights

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy T1: Assessment of transport matters

Representation ID: 6115

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to T1: Adds nothing to NPPF

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy T2: Parking

Representation ID: 6116

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to T2: Not appropriate to insist on minimum standards where public transport is adequate

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.