Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Rumball Sedgwick search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Section One - Introduction and Context

Representation ID: 5810

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to Plan (general): Current document is much too long

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP1: Sustainable Development in North Hertfordshire

Representation ID: 6098

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to SP1: states that the Plan supports growth and looks to sustain the long-term viability of the District's villages, but that is not always carried through into the subsequent chapters and policies of the plan.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP2: Settlement Hierarchy

Representation ID: 6099

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to SP2: Overreliance on large sites adjoining town, high risk approach, unlikely to deliver five-year land supply, village boundaries arbitrary and do not allow for growth

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy HS1: Local Housing Allocations

Representation ID: 6100

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to HS1: Request to include additional site: Land south of Ash Mill, Barkway

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP8: Housing

Representation ID: 6101

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to SP8: Overreliance on large sites adjoining town, high risk approach, will not deliver five-year land supply

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP7: Infrastructure Requirements and Developer Contributions

Representation ID: 6102

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to SP7: The weight of planning contributions must not be allowed to compromise the deliverability of much needed housing and not all schemes will be capable of, or for that matter need to, pay for additional infrastructure.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy ETC1: Appropriate uses in Employment areas

Representation ID: 6103

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ETC1: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy ETC2: Employment development outside Employment Areas

Representation ID: 6104

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ETC2: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy ETC3: New retail, leisure and other main town centres development

Representation ID: 6105

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ETC3: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy ETC4: Primary Shopping Frontages

Representation ID: 6106

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ETC4: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.