Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 1644

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Revell

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Object to D4:
- Development of BA1 will have serious impact to the air quality of Baldock due to the increased volume of traffic alone during & after the development.
- Plan is unjustified and not effective.

Full text:

Ref: SP8/SP14
2) Baldock has a history of bad air quality which was reduced with the development of the bypass. Referring to Policy D4 and specifically 9.28, with a development the size of BA1, this is going to have a significant impact on air quality, even if you assumed an average of one car per household, that's the additional emmissions of 3290 cars being injected into a small town alone, let alone all the other forms of emissions/pollution that will be generated during & post the development. As well as the obvious health concerns, pollutants can cause damage to historic buildings which are plentiful in Baldock, especially within the Conservation area. Based on this policy alone, BA1 should be rejected and therefore plan is UNJUSTIFIED and NOT EFFECTIVE