Sustainability Draft Supplementary Planning Document

Search representations

Results for Mrs Jill Saunders search

New search New search

Comment

Sustainability Draft Supplementary Planning Document

Land use & wildlife

Representation ID: 10403

Received: 13/02/2024

Respondent: Mrs Jill Saunders

Representation Summary:

This is is useful summary/reiteration of measures which already apply, for example, for wildlife corridors, biodiversity and protected species. Why, therefore, was development allowed to ignore protected species? See IC2 Burford Grange photographic evidence submitted, of badgers entering site on wildlife corridor. Furthermore, why was development allowed to ignore requirements made by the Planning Inspector in his final report on the Local Plan (Sep 22, MM269), regarding retention of planting at IC2 to maintain integrity of revised Green Belt boundary. So much lost habitat. It's a crying shame.

Full text:

This is is useful summary/reiteration of measures which already apply, for example, for wildlife corridors, biodiversity and protected species. Why, therefore, was development allowed to ignore protected species? See IC2 Burford Grange photographic evidence submitted, of badgers entering site on wildlife corridor. Furthermore, why was development allowed to ignore requirements made by the Planning Inspector in his final report on the Local Plan (Sep 22, MM269), regarding retention of planting at IC2 to maintain integrity of revised Green Belt boundary. So much lost habitat. It's a crying shame.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.