Comment
Sustainability Draft Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 10403
Received: 13/02/2024
Respondent: Mrs Jill Saunders
This is is useful summary/reiteration of measures which already apply, for example, for wildlife corridors, biodiversity and protected species. Why, therefore, was development allowed to ignore protected species? See IC2 Burford Grange photographic evidence submitted, of badgers entering site on wildlife corridor. Furthermore, why was development allowed to ignore requirements made by the Planning Inspector in his final report on the Local Plan (Sep 22, MM269), regarding retention of planting at IC2 to maintain integrity of revised Green Belt boundary. So much lost habitat. It's a crying shame.
This is is useful summary/reiteration of measures which already apply, for example, for wildlife corridors, biodiversity and protected species. Why, therefore, was development allowed to ignore protected species? See IC2 Burford Grange photographic evidence submitted, of badgers entering site on wildlife corridor. Furthermore, why was development allowed to ignore requirements made by the Planning Inspector in his final report on the Local Plan (Sep 22, MM269), regarding retention of planting at IC2 to maintain integrity of revised Green Belt boundary. So much lost habitat. It's a crying shame.