Proposed Main Modifications

Search representations

Results for The Breachwood Green Society search

New search New search

Object

Proposed Main Modifications

MM008 - Page 31 Policy SP1 (c) (iv)

Representation ID: 7035

Received: 28/02/2019

Respondent: The Breachwood Green Society

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

See attached

Full text:

Policy SP1 - Stated policy is to ensure the vitality of the district's villages and protect the biodiversity of the landscape. This is directly contradicted by the East of Luton Development. This would destroy the character of the villages of Cockernhoe, Mangrove and Tea Green, disrupt community life and cause coalescence. It proposes replacing the existing ancient landscape with an artificially created 'amenity area'.
Policy SP19 directly contradicts the established principle of coalescence that is in place to protect small communities, by advocating 'the integration of existing settlements.'
This attempt to disguise a volte-face on what village communities need is being promoted to provide just 150 homes for Herts - the remaining thousands to accommodate Luton's needs which appear to be escalating (Policy SP8) and requiring even more Herts land.
The location is inappropriate for development since it encroaches on Green Belt land and is very badly located in relation to transport links to all the main routes to the West and the effect of the extra traffic burden on local country lanes in Hertfordshire.

Object

Proposed Main Modifications

MM083 - Page 71 Policy SP19

Representation ID: 7201

Received: 28/02/2019

Respondent: The Breachwood Green Society

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

See attached

Full text:

Policy SP1 - Stated policy is to ensure the vitality of the district's villages and protect the biodiversity of the landscape. This is directly contradicted by the East of Luton Development. This would destroy the character of the villages of Cockernhoe, Mangrove and Tea Green, disrupt community life and cause coalescence. It proposes replacing the existing ancient landscape with an artificially created 'amenity area'.
Policy SP19 directly contradicts the established principle of coalescence that is in place to protect small communities, by advocating 'the integration of existing settlements.'
This attempt to disguise a volte-face on what village communities need is being promoted to provide just 150 homes for Herts - the remaining thousands to accommodate Luton's needs which appear to be escalating (Policy SP8) and requiring even more Herts land.
The location is inappropriate for development since it encroaches on Green Belt land and is very badly located in relation to transport links to all the main routes to the West and the effect of the extra traffic burden on local country lanes in Hertfordshire.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.