Proposed Main Modifications

Search representations

Results for Mr Ben Merison search

New search New search

Object

Proposed Main Modifications

MM208 - Page 139 Policy BA4 (ED146A)

Representation ID: 6712

Received: 04/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Ben Merison

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

See full text

Full text:

I am contacting you to raise an objection to your modification to the Baldock local housing plan, in particular with respect to sections BA4 and BA3. I strongly object to your plans to build section BA4 on the back of Clothall Common, and the fact you have now modified the plans to join this with BA3 I find utterly disgraceful. This surrounding countryside is used by many local residents and provides a good environment for helping local people with physical and mental wellbeing, as well as being an excellent area for all wildlife, including providing a good region for dog walking.

Baldock currently thrives from its status as a small town with a buzzing local community, where every member contributes strongly to maintaining the status of this community. There is no shortage of houses for sale in Baldock, and these plans to build copious amounts of extra houses are quite frankly neither needed nor wanted.

By continuing to proceed with these plans it comes across as though you are not concerned about the physical or mental wellbeing of Baldock's current residents, or about protecting important landscapes or heritage assets of North Hertfordshire.

I thank you for taking the time to read through this e-mail and wholeheartedly hope you consider removing the modification to section BA4 in your proposal plan.

Object

Proposed Main Modifications

MM207 - Page 138 Policy BA3 (ED146A)

Representation ID: 6796

Received: 04/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Ben Merison

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

See full text

Full text:

I am contacting you to raise an objection to your modification to the Baldock local housing plan, in particular with respect to sections BA4 and BA3. I strongly object to your plans to build section BA4 on the back of Clothall Common, and the fact you have now modified the plans to join this with BA3 I find utterly disgraceful. This surrounding countryside is used by many local residents and provides a good environment for helping local people with physical and mental wellbeing, as well as being an excellent area for all wildlife, including providing a good region for dog walking.

Baldock currently thrives from its status as a small town with a buzzing local community, where every member contributes strongly to maintaining the status of this community. There is no shortage of houses for sale in Baldock, and these plans to build copious amounts of extra houses are quite frankly neither needed nor wanted.

By continuing to proceed with these plans it comes across as though you are not concerned about the physical or mental wellbeing of Baldock's current residents, or about protecting important landscapes or heritage assets of North Hertfordshire.

I thank you for taking the time to read through this e-mail and wholeheartedly hope you consider removing the modification to section BA4 in your proposal plan.

Object

Proposed Main Modifications

MM387 Housing Allocations BA3 & BA4

Representation ID: 6797

Received: 04/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Ben Merison

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

See full text

Full text:

I am contacting you to raise an objection to your modification to the Baldock local housing plan, in particular with respect to sections BA4 and BA3. I strongly object to your plans to build section BA4 on the back of Clothall Common, and the fact you have now modified the plans to join this with BA3 I find utterly disgraceful. This surrounding countryside is used by many local residents and provides a good environment for helping local people with physical and mental wellbeing, as well as being an excellent area for all wildlife, including providing a good region for dog walking.

Baldock currently thrives from its status as a small town with a buzzing local community, where every member contributes strongly to maintaining the status of this community. There is no shortage of houses for sale in Baldock, and these plans to build copious amounts of extra houses are quite frankly neither needed nor wanted.

By continuing to proceed with these plans it comes across as though you are not concerned about the physical or mental wellbeing of Baldock's current residents, or about protecting important landscapes or heritage assets of North Hertfordshire.

I thank you for taking the time to read through this e-mail and wholeheartedly hope you consider removing the modification to section BA4 in your proposal plan.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.