Pirton Neighbourhood Development Plan 2011 - 2031

Comment

Representation ID: 6376

Received: 20/03/2017

Respondent: F and P Property Management

Agent: Rapleys LLP

Two sites would make logical extensions to Pirton village and should be included in the village boundary:
Land adjacent to Pirton Recreation Ground and
Land to the north of Shillington Road.

Object

Representation ID: 6389

Received: 20/03/2017

Respondent: F and P Property Management

Agent: Rapleys LLP

The NDP is premature, and cannot meet the requirements set by the NPPF that it
stand in conformity with an up-to-date Local Plan. Further, the evidence base presented is not sufficient to adequately inform a document that will be part of the Development Plan. In this context, it is suggested that a proper evidence base be commissioned, and the NDP reviewed in light of this. Further consultation should then take place on the revised NDP, after the Local Plan is adopted, in advance of Examination.

Object

Representation ID: 6390

Received: 20/03/2017

Respondent: F and P Property Management

Agent: Rapleys LLP

Object on the following grounds:
policy should support development on sites adjacent to the village boundary;
no evidence to inform the threshold given in the policy;
policy should recognise that not all sites will be able to deliver specific provision for families and downsizers;
in terms of affordable housing, the policy should recognise that viability must be considered on a site by site basis;
criterion 6 is unnecessary and would be impossible to enforce;
criterion relating to construction plans should be deleted; and
criterion 8 is not necessary and should be deleted.

Detailed wording changes are suggested.

Object

Representation ID: 6391

Received: 20/03/2017

Respondent: F and P Property Management

Agent: Rapleys LLP

Object on the following grounds:
not appropriate for the policy to seek arbitrary levels of density over a wide area;
criteria (3) and (5) should be replaced with a single criterion; and
criterion (13) should be deleted - the consideration that proposals should have to the surrounding areas is detailed in Policy PNP2(1).

Object

Representation ID: 6392

Received: 20/03/2017

Respondent: F and P Property Management

Agent: Rapleys LLP

The list of key views should be amended to remove any which do not involve the AONB.