Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mr John D Vaughan search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
SP2 Land beween Horn Hill and Bendish Lane, Whitwell
Representation ID: 567
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Mr John D Vaughan
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to SP2: Evidence base to identify sustainable villages is flawed. More evidence is needed on impact on car usage.
Object to Chapter 4, Policy SP8
Sites, including SP2, have been added at a very late stage and should be removed as they are not needed.
Object to Chapter 4, Policy SP2
The plan is not sound as the evidence used to identify sustainable villages is flawed. This results in isolated villages with no facilities such as a senior school and shops and very little public transport being seen as suitable for significant development. More evidence is needed on impact on car usage. Whitwell should be categorised as a 'B' village
require SP2 to be removed from the local plan
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 604
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Mr John D Vaughan
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to Policy SP8: Sites, including SP2, have been added at a very late stage and should be removed as they are not needed.
Object to Chapter 4, Policy SP8
Sites, including SP2, have been added at a very late stage and should be removed as they are not needed.
Object to Chapter 4, Policy SP2
The plan is not sound as the evidence used to identify sustainable villages is flawed. This results in isolated villages with no facilities such as a senior school and shops and very little public transport being seen as suitable for significant development. More evidence is needed on impact on car usage. Whitwell should be categorised as a 'B' village
require SP2 to be removed from the local plan
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP2: Settlement Hierarchy
Representation ID: 3572
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Mr John D Vaughan
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP2: Evidence used to identify sustainable villages is flawed. Whitwell should be categorised as a 'B' village
Object to Chapter 4, Policy SP8
Sites, including SP2, have been added at a very late stage and should be removed as they are not needed.
Object to Chapter 4, Policy SP2
The plan is not sound as the evidence used to identify sustainable villages is flawed. This results in isolated villages with no facilities such as a senior school and shops and very little public transport being seen as suitable for significant development. More evidence is needed on impact on car usage. Whitwell should be categorised as a 'B' village
require SP2 to be removed from the local plan
