Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 5313

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Great Ashby Community Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to SP18: lack of adequate infrastructure with regard to road access, education and health facilities, contrary to transport policies of plan, loss of Green Belt, use land west of Stevenage instead

Object

Representation ID: 5314

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Great Ashby Community Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to GA1: lack of adequate infrastructure with regard to road access, education and health facilities, challenge transport assessment supporting GA1 (report appended), contrary to transport policies of plan, loss of Green Belt, use land west of Stevenage instead

Object

Representation ID: 5315

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Great Ashby Community Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to SP16: Use land west of Stevenage instead

Support

Representation ID: 5316

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Great Ashby Community Council

Support Baldock (general): Good road and rail links, better able to cope with extra housing than other areas, stimulate town economy and revive high street.

Object

Representation ID: 5487

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Great Ashby Community Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to SP8: Land west of Stevenage would provide substantial housing with much less of an impact upon existing residential areas