Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mr Steve Ingle search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP15: Site LG1 - North of Letchworth Garden City
Representation ID: 2353
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Steve Ingle
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to LG3:
- Scale of development
- Garden City heritage
- Building on Green Belt
- Both the LG1 and LG3 sites risk merging Letchworth with stotfold and Baldock
- Increase traffic and congestions
- Increase in pollution
- Pedestrian safety
- Highway infrastructure
- Community facilities and health care
- Brownfield first
- New garden city/township
I wish to register my opposition to the plans for the LG1 and LG3 sites in Letchworth as part of the council's local plan.
I believe that the number of proposed dwellings would have an extremely detrimental effect on the local area and on Letchworth Garden City as a whole. Building on Green Belt is unacceptable as it flies in the face of Ebeneezer Howard's principals for a Garden City and current government advice. It seems very odd to destroy the key principals the first gardens city whilst the government plans to build new garden cities.
Both the LG1 and LG3 sites risk merging Letchworth with stotfold and Baldock respectively, LG1 will expand Letchworth to within 50m of the Bedfordshire border. Any proposed sites should avoid urban sprawl and therefore I believe that this is unacceptable.
Both sites (particularly LG1 ) will greatly increase the traffic in the area and therefore increase the amount of pollution in the area as well. Many of the roads in especially Norton road and Green lane are already at capacity during peak times.The proposed sites are about 1.5 miles (2.4 km) away from Letchworth Rail Station. As acknowledged in the COTTEE report this is outside of expected walking distances hence additional traffic will add to congestion suffered at peak times. The station also has no infrastructure to cope with the likely increase in cars.
With the infrastructure of the town as a whole it lacks the doctors and schools to support the developments and there is no mention of how this will be addressed within the plans.
The LG3 site it proposed to be built right next to the newly discovered Bronze Age Henge, a site of national significance this should be celebrated and enjoyed rather than surrounding it with houses.
There are many brownfield sites within north Hertfordshire which though may not be as profitable should be built on first. If further housing is required then proposals suggested by our local MPs should be pursued and a new garden city established this would enhance Letchworth legacy rather than the current plans which would destroy it.
I hope you take these objections seriously.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
LG3 Land east of Kristiansand Way and Talbot Way
Representation ID: 2354
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Steve Ingle
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to LG3:
- Scale of development
- Garden City heritage
- Building on Green Belt
- Both the LG1 and LG3 sites risk merging Letchworth with stotfold and Baldock
- Increase traffic and congestions
- Increase in pollution
- Pedestrian safety
- Highway infrastructure
- Community facilities and health care
- LG3 location next to Bronze Age Henge
- Brownfield first
- New garden city/township
I wish to register my opposition to the plans for the LG1 and LG3 sites in Letchworth as part of the council's local plan.
I believe that the number of proposed dwellings would have an extremely detrimental effect on the local area and on Letchworth Garden City as a whole. Building on Green Belt is unacceptable as it flies in the face of Ebeneezer Howard's principals for a Garden City and current government advice. It seems very odd to destroy the key principals the first gardens city whilst the government plans to build new garden cities.
Both the LG1 and LG3 sites risk merging Letchworth with stotfold and Baldock respectively, LG1 will expand Letchworth to within 50m of the Bedfordshire border. Any proposed sites should avoid urban sprawl and therefore I believe that this is unacceptable.
Both sites (particularly LG1 ) will greatly increase the traffic in the area and therefore increase the amount of pollution in the area as well. Many of the roads in especially Norton road and Green lane are already at capacity during peak times.The proposed sites are about 1.5 miles (2.4 km) away from Letchworth Rail Station. As acknowledged in the COTTEE report this is outside of expected walking distances hence additional traffic will add to congestion suffered at peak times. The station also has no infrastructure to cope with the likely increase in cars.
With the infrastructure of the town as a whole it lacks the doctors and schools to support the developments and there is no mention of how this will be addressed within the plans.
The LG3 site it proposed to be built right next to the newly discovered Bronze Age Henge, a site of national significance this should be celebrated and enjoyed rather than surrounding it with houses.
There are many brownfield sites within north Hertfordshire which though may not be as profitable should be built on first. If further housing is required then proposals suggested by our local MPs should be pursued and a new garden city established this would enhance Letchworth legacy rather than the current plans which would destroy it.
I hope you take these objections seriously.