Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Ms Annette H Jones search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
HT1 Land at Highover Farm
Representation ID: 1663
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Annette H Jones
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Objection to HT1 on the grounds of:
- congestion on roads leading into Hitchin town centre, peak times especially
- impact on parking in the town centre and at Hitchin station
- study on congestion and parking needed
- underused site to the east of the station could be used for parking
- park and ride bus service could be provided at the station
I am concerned about the knock on effects of such a big development on congestion on the roads leading into Hitchin town centre, especially around points which are already log jammed during peak periods (eg. Cambridge Road, Nightingale Road, Walsworth Road and the Railway Station). I am also concerned about the impact on parking provision within the town centre as well as at Hitchin Station.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
HT12 Paynes Park
Representation ID: 1664
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Annette H Jones
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Objection to HT12 on the grounds of:
- unnecessary
- increase in car traffic: quality of life and parking
- if unsuccessful, closed retail units would be an eyesore
I am concerned about plans for expanded retail development which I consider unnecessary for the needs of the town's residents. If successful, this plan will have the effect of attracting additional car traffic with an adverse impact on the quality of life and available parking. If unsuccessful, the town will be left with the eyesore of closed retail units.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 1669
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Annette H Jones
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Object to SP8:Proposal to remove Green Belt protection from land West of Stevenage. It staggers me that para 4.104 states that Stevenage's plan is likely to have limited development opportunities when it seems that when available sites which could be used for housing are given over to yet more retail development.
I object strongly to the proposal to remove Green Belt protection from land West of Stevenage and regard this as an unnecessary step. It staggers me that para 4.104 states that Stevenage's plan is likely to have limited development opportunities when it seems that when available sites which could be used for housing are given over to yet more retail development.
