Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 5688

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Objection AS1:
- adverse impact on landscape historic environment and chalk uplands character of the area
- not consistent NPPF 11

Object

Representation ID: 5689

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object BA1:
- number of homes would change size and character of Baldock
- huge impact on current infrastructure
- would need to be significant investment and improvement to education,health, railway and roads
- large number of commuters and would increase
- need for parking, already problematic in many areas

Object

Representation ID: 5690

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object BK3:
- ancient linear village
- unsustainable: lack of amenities including education, health, transport and minimal public transport (therefore increasing the carbon footprint).
- site breaches NPPF 3 (Supporting a prosperous rural economy), NPPF 4 (Promoting sustainable transport), NPPF 8 (Promoting healthy communities) and NPPF 11 (Conserving and enhancing the natural environment).

Object

Representation ID: 5691

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object SP19:
- unsustainable for development as all are in the Green Belt.
- five purposes of NPPF 9 are clear and these developments are inappropriate.
- current infrastructure would be insufficient to accommodate the increase in traffic movements and no clear transport model exists to support, so this makes the sites unsustainable.

Object

Representation ID: 5692

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object NS1:
- unsustainable site for development- coalescence with Stevenage urbanisation.
- contravenes NPPF 11 (Conserving and enhancing the natural environment).
- AECOM Local Plan model testing job number 60271338, technical note 7 highlights the issues, but is not site specific.
- Stevenage development and North Hertfordshire, without improved joined up infrastructure, will cause further significant problems on and around the A1M corridor.

Object

Representation ID: 5694

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object KB1:
- number of homes proposed would completely change the character of Knebworth
- huge impact on the current infrastructure
- would need to be a significant amount of investment and improvement to education, health, railway and roads.
- huge number of commuters and would increase
- increase in the need for parking which is already problematic in many areas of the village
- adverse impact on the already heavily congested A1M which, at peak times, is gridlocked

Object

Representation ID: 5695

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object KB2:
- number of homes proposed would completely change the character of Knebworth
- huge impact on the current infrastructure
- would need to be a significant amount of investment and improvement to education, health, railway and roads.
- huge number of commuters and would increase.
- increase in the need for parking which is already problematic in many areas of the village.
- adverse impact on the already heavily congested A1M which, at peak times, is gridlocked.

Object

Representation ID: 5696

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object KB3:
- number of homes proposed would completely change the character of Knebworth
- huge impact on the current infrastructure
- would need to be a significant amount of investment and improvement to education, health, railway and roads.
- huge number of commuters and would increase.
- increase in the need for parking which is already problematic in many areas of the village.
- adverse impact on the already heavily congested A1M which, at peak times, is gridlocked.

Object

Representation ID: 5697

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object KB4:
- number of homes proposed would completely change the character of Knebworth
- huge impact on the current infrastructure
- would need to be a significant amount of investment and improvement to education, health, railway and roads.
- huge number of commuters and would increase.
- increase in the need for parking which is already problematic in many areas of the village.
- adverse impact on the already heavily congested A1M which, at peak times, is gridlocked.

Object

Representation ID: 5698

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill

Number of people: 7

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object RY1:
- previously described as "unsustainable" by the Inspector when a planning application by Royston Football Club was submitted and resulted in an Appeal.
- no change in the "sustainability" issue to justify residential over leisure
- impact on the Heath (SSS1 and Local Nature Reserve)
- impact on the highway
- the site originally fell outside the defined town boundary.