Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mrs Nancy Copeland search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Royston

Representation ID: 131

Received: 31/10/2016

Respondent: Mrs Nancy Copeland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

General objection: scale of previous development, availability of infrastructure, loss of agricultural land, visual impact of solar farm, overpopulation.

Full text:

There has been too many houses already built in the town, there are not the facilities to cover such growth. There is not enough energy available for the houses, so ugly solar farms are erected such as the one alongside Royston by pass taking land which would be better used for agriculture. The Town Hall should be left as it is one of the few building which is Royston. The trees on this site were carefully selected and add a great deal to the site and should, therefore, left exactly where they are. The car park should be left as it is, we need more parking not less especially with all the extra houses already built. You already get cars parking every available space all across Royston. When will the real problem be looked and that is there are too many people in the country.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

RY12 Town Hall Site, Melbourn Street

Representation ID: 132

Received: 31/10/2016

Respondent: Mrs Nancy Copeland

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to Site RY12: Loss of building of local character, loss of car parking, existing trees to be retained.

Full text:

There has been too many houses already built in the town, there are not the facilities to cover such growth. There is not enough energy available for the houses, so ugly solar farms are erected such as the one alongside Royston by pass taking land which would be better used for agriculture. The Town Hall should be left as it is one of the few building which is Royston. The trees on this site were carefully selected and add a great deal to the site and should, therefore, left exactly where they are. The car park should be left as it is, we need more parking not less especially with all the extra houses already built. You already get cars parking every available space all across Royston. When will the real problem be looked and that is there are too many people in the country.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.