Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mr Patrick Gallagher search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP19: Sites EL1, EL2 and EL3 - East of Luton
Representation ID: 2494
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt;
new houses will not help the housing problems;
loss of recreation opportunities;
detrimental effect on Cockernhoe;
congestion; and
pressure on education and healthcare services.
I am writing to express my deep concern on the potential release of greenbelt land around Cockernhoe.
Greenbelt was designed to stop urban sprawl never has this been more important and relevant. However well architects and planners dress up plans and drawings the loss of this land is immense .
Cockernhoe will be overrun and destroyed. The land has major appeal to the residents in Wigmore as it is an area where than go for walks to clear their mind and enjoy gentle exercise.
these new houses will not in any way help the national housing problem . we need new towns with dedicated infrastructure to cope with our expanding population. more houses mean more cars more congestion more frustration more stress more pressure on doctors more pressure on hospitals more pressure on schools more pressure on everyday life. I am hoping that common sense will prevail and this greenbelt land will be left alone to serve the purpose it was designed for
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt
Representation ID: 2495
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt;
new houses will not help the housing problems;
loss of recreation opportunities;
detrimental effect on Cockernhoe;
congestion; and
pressure on education and healthcare services.
I am writing to express my deep concern on the potential release of greenbelt land around Cockernhoe.
Greenbelt was designed to stop urban sprawl never has this been more important and relevant. However well architects and planners dress up plans and drawings the loss of this land is immense .
Cockernhoe will be overrun and destroyed. The land has major appeal to the residents in Wigmore as it is an area where than go for walks to clear their mind and enjoy gentle exercise.
these new houses will not in any way help the national housing problem . we need new towns with dedicated infrastructure to cope with our expanding population. more houses mean more cars more congestion more frustration more stress more pressure on doctors more pressure on hospitals more pressure on schools more pressure on everyday life. I am hoping that common sense will prevail and this greenbelt land will be left alone to serve the purpose it was designed for
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP19: Sites EL1, EL2 and EL3 - East of Luton
Representation ID: 4766
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Loss of Green Belt, no very special circumstances, impact on existing villages, out of proportion, traffic, loss of recreational opportunities, unsustainable, biodiversity
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 4767
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Luton's unmet needs not qualified, sufficient brownfield land in Luton
See attached