Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mr Patrick Gallagher search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP19: Sites EL1, EL2 and EL3 - East of Luton

Representation ID: 2494

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt;
new houses will not help the housing problems;
loss of recreation opportunities;
detrimental effect on Cockernhoe;
congestion; and
pressure on education and healthcare services.

Full text:

I am writing to express my deep concern on the potential release of greenbelt land around Cockernhoe.
Greenbelt was designed to stop urban sprawl never has this been more important and relevant. However well architects and planners dress up plans and drawings the loss of this land is immense .
Cockernhoe will be overrun and destroyed. The land has major appeal to the residents in Wigmore as it is an area where than go for walks to clear their mind and enjoy gentle exercise.
these new houses will not in any way help the national housing problem . we need new towns with dedicated infrastructure to cope with our expanding population. more houses mean more cars more congestion more frustration more stress more pressure on doctors more pressure on hospitals more pressure on schools more pressure on everyday life. I am hoping that common sense will prevail and this greenbelt land will be left alone to serve the purpose it was designed for

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt

Representation ID: 2495

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt;
new houses will not help the housing problems;
loss of recreation opportunities;
detrimental effect on Cockernhoe;
congestion; and
pressure on education and healthcare services.

Full text:

I am writing to express my deep concern on the potential release of greenbelt land around Cockernhoe.
Greenbelt was designed to stop urban sprawl never has this been more important and relevant. However well architects and planners dress up plans and drawings the loss of this land is immense .
Cockernhoe will be overrun and destroyed. The land has major appeal to the residents in Wigmore as it is an area where than go for walks to clear their mind and enjoy gentle exercise.
these new houses will not in any way help the national housing problem . we need new towns with dedicated infrastructure to cope with our expanding population. more houses mean more cars more congestion more frustration more stress more pressure on doctors more pressure on hospitals more pressure on schools more pressure on everyday life. I am hoping that common sense will prevail and this greenbelt land will be left alone to serve the purpose it was designed for

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP19: Sites EL1, EL2 and EL3 - East of Luton

Representation ID: 4766

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Loss of Green Belt, no very special circumstances, impact on existing villages, out of proportion, traffic, loss of recreational opportunities, unsustainable, biodiversity

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP8: Housing

Representation ID: 4767

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Patrick Gallagher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Luton's unmet needs not qualified, sufficient brownfield land in Luton

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.