Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for M & J Oakley search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP14: Site BA1 - North of Baldock

Representation ID: 134

Received: 21/10/2016

Respondent: M & J Oakley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to BA1: Loss of agricultural land and business, overdevelopment of Baldock, proposed link road insufficient to address congestion, need to relocate station

Full text:

In response to the North Herts Development Local plan.

As long term Hertfordshire county council tenant farmers of this land we obviously do not want this development to go ahead!

Living & working the land surrounding Baldock we have been able to provide a valuable service to the surrounding towns, providing a choice of local produce & provide services & facilities for the equestrian leisure industry, on selling off these small holding these valuable businesses will be lost for good! Small holdings on Greenbelt land provides unique businesses to serve rural towns once lost you won't get them back....

In response to the development of Baldock town, this will almost double the size of a attractive & vibrant coaching town completely distorting a already congested centre. I can not see even with putting in a road link from the A507 across the railway line will you be able to ease an already congested road, unless the railway station moves out of the site its at & moves further north it will not be able to cope with the volume of people & traffic.... I can only envisage total grid lock!!!

2,800 new homes should be allocated on a site away from existing towns, this is a new town which should be positioned on its own, its own right where infrastructure can be laid out in place where it will work, example an 'Odsey Development' by Ashwell Station on A505, a town in its own right, oh but of course that's not North Herts Land you say... Drop the boundaries & plan together!!!

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP8: Housing

Representation ID: 222

Received: 21/10/2016

Respondent: M & J Oakley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to spatial distribution: Provide a new settlement of 2,800 homes outside NHDC adjoining Ashwell Station.

Full text:

In response to the North Herts Development Local plan.

As long term Hertfordshire county council tenant farmers of this land we obviously do not want this development to go ahead!

Living & working the land surrounding Baldock we have been able to provide a valuable service to the surrounding towns, providing a choice of local produce & provide services & facilities for the equestrian leisure industry, on selling off these small holding these valuable businesses will be lost for good! Small holdings on Greenbelt land provides unique businesses to serve rural towns once lost you won't get them back....

In response to the development of Baldock town, this will almost double the size of a attractive & vibrant coaching town completely distorting a already congested centre. I can not see even with putting in a road link from the A507 across the railway line will you be able to ease an already congested road, unless the railway station moves out of the site its at & moves further north it will not be able to cope with the volume of people & traffic.... I can only envisage total grid lock!!!

2,800 new homes should be allocated on a site away from existing towns, this is a new town which should be positioned on its own, its own right where infrastructure can be laid out in place where it will work, example an 'Odsey Development' by Ashwell Station on A505, a town in its own right, oh but of course that's not North Herts Land you say... Drop the boundaries & plan together!!!

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.