Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mr Nigel Platt search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Knebworth

Representation ID: 2202

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Nigel Platt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to Knebworth (in general):
- Risk of coalesce with Stevenage
- Loss of Green Belt
- Contrary to NPPF
- Village identity
- Lack of strategy
- Infrastructure requirements for growth
- Land west of Stevenage
- Highway infrastructure and congestion
- Narrow rail way bridges
- Train facilities and capacity
- Local economy and employment opportunities
- Drainage and flood risk
- Landscape character
- Conservation and heritage issues

Full text:

I wish to register my strong objection to the proposed development in and surrounding Knebworth. My main concerns are based on the following main points:


* Severe risk of the village joining with Stevenage and thereby losing separate identity - effective coalescence.
* Green Belt removal from around Knebworth
* contrary to Government policy, the significant contribution it
makes to protecting the space between towns in the district and
maintaining the separate identity of Knebworth as a village

* Lack of a strategy for Knebworth means the plan is not effective
— no connection between housing, cumulative development and
infrastructure needed to support the growth sustainably
* Amount of housing
— increase of 663 dwellings in Knebworth 2011-2031 (31%)
— not justifi ed when Stevenage West land is reserved (3,100 homes)
— extra impact of Woolmer Green plans (150 homes) not considered
* Green Belt removal from around Knebworth
— contrary to Government policy, the signifi cant contribution it
makes to protecting the space between towns in the district and
maintaining the separate identity of Knebworth as a village
* Highways and transport impacts
— impact on B197, congestion on local roads and bridges.- Bridge at Deards end lane crossing railway narrow and hazardous, Station approach narrow and unsafe for pedestrians, and gun road same issues
*Severe overcrowding on the commuter train network already - system running at capacity in peak times.
* No consideration of local economy
— no proposals for jobs creation, no commercial allocation
— impact of reallocation for housing in village centre
* Drainage issues
— major capacity issue at Rye Meads Sewage Treatment Works
* Impact on countryside and landscape
— loss of countryside and open landscape setting
* Conservation and heritage issues
— impact on the two village Conservation Areas. Both of which have been well protected in the past.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.