Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mr Richard Ross-Langley search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt

Representation ID: 1052

Received: 28/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Richard Ross-Langley

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to SP5:
- Lack of consultation regarding sudden removal of KB4 from the Green Belt.
- Unsound: failure to justify permanent removal of Green Belt .
- Unsound, not justified: planned provision of extra accommodation is not an exceptional circumstance.
- No co-operation in protecting Green Belt; a better alternative exists in the use of reserved area west of Stevenage.
- Infrastructure improvements needed.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Knebworth

Representation ID: 1498

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Richard Ross-Langley

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

It is not sensible nor effective to add more traffic and more people to the current traffic and road safety problems on and around the B197 through Knebworth.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

KB4 Land east of Knebworth

Representation ID: 1581

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Richard Ross-Langley

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to KB4:
- Poor consultation on KB4, should not be in the draft plan.
- Green Belt areas provide 'openness' and prevent coalescence.
- The infrastructure (road, rail, broadband) is not adequate to support development in Knebworth.

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

KB4 Land east of Knebworth

Representation ID: 5027

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Richard Ross-Langley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
plan is not legally compliant; and
lack of consultation regarding the removal of the site from the green belt.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.