Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Infrastructure and transportation networks are inadequately addressed in the parts of the plan relating sites East of Luton, to meet Luton's unmet Housing Need East of Luton.

I object that there is no justifiable need to declassify Land East of Luton from the Green Belt.

There are many viable alternatives, so the Local Plan is not in accordance with the National Framework Planning Policy since it is not "absolutely necessary."
I wish to change this plan. I want to participate in the Examination.

This will impact all of Luton; Wigmore, Stopsley, Eaton Green, Round Green and even Luton Airport.
With the extensive Luton Airport expansion plans will come significant increases in traffic.
Access to Luton town centre from Hitchin is already a constant bottleneck during busy times of the day. Access to the airport at the same times of day is torturous and getting from Stopsley to the M1 ( 4 miles) takes anything from 15 to 40 minutes at these busy times.
Any increase in traffic levels is only bound to intensify this situation.

2,105 or more houses with anything from 1 to 4 cars per home will lead to unacceptable congestion consequences for this area.

Air quality and pollution has not be assessed in the residential areas around the airport and is bound to deteriorate.
Both LBC and NHDC have noted concerns over lack of necessary infrastructure and inadequate road networks due to the already existent congestion. The Transport Assessments were not robust. Their data was inadequate and inaccurate; they did not include impacts of all new developments in the vicinity, they were not carried out for long enough, and some studies from Luton Borough Council assumed roads that did not even exist. Traffic congestion in Wigmore is already at unacceptable levels.
The Plan is not deliverable if the basic required infrastructure and transportation access has not been delivered also.
If you consider that Cockernhoe is 50 houses, the expansion threat is a huge 4,200 per cent!! This is disproportionate.
Wigmore currently consists of about 4,500 houses, so this proposal is an unacceptably disproportionate level of expansion.

Therefore logic would dictate that all other infrastructure must also be matched by an expansion of 50 per cent too - so half of every public service available in Wigmore; ranging from shops and retail outlets, car parks, secondary and primary schools, petrol stations, policing services, fire services, health services, dental services must all be also expanded to that same degree. As a current resident of Wigmore I can tell you that the congestion on our roads has increased recently and it is unbelievably difficult to get a doctors appointment.

Where will the money for all this come from to upgrade our infrastructure? I am confident that the developers will not be paying for any of it.
Cockernhoe Village will no longer even exist. It would destroy an entire rural community and displace a village. It would change the character of the area to an unacceptable degree
There have been no mitigating solutions to the air and noise pollution that will be generated from the extra cars, or the airport expansion in this area.

The unmet housing need figure also shows inaccuracies. During Executive Meetings LBC stated the need for a collaboration between neighbouring councils to commission another Strategic Housing Management Assessment to re-examine once more the Unmet Housing Need figure assumptions, due to their estimated nature but far-reaching consequences and drastic impact upon the area. Luton's unmet housing need figure is based on migration statistics.
Please consider this written address that I wish to change the Local Plan and participate in the Examination.