Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for M & J Oakley search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP14: Site BA1 - North of Baldock
Representation ID: 134
Received: 21/10/2016
Respondent: M & J Oakley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to BA1: Loss of agricultural land and business, overdevelopment of Baldock, proposed link road insufficient to address congestion, need to relocate station
In response to the North Herts Development Local plan.
As long term Hertfordshire county council tenant farmers of this land we obviously do not want this development to go ahead!
Living & working the land surrounding Baldock we have been able to provide a valuable service to the surrounding towns, providing a choice of local produce & provide services & facilities for the equestrian leisure industry, on selling off these small holding these valuable businesses will be lost for good! Small holdings on Greenbelt land provides unique businesses to serve rural towns once lost you won't get them back....
In response to the development of Baldock town, this will almost double the size of a attractive & vibrant coaching town completely distorting a already congested centre. I can not see even with putting in a road link from the A507 across the railway line will you be able to ease an already congested road, unless the railway station moves out of the site its at & moves further north it will not be able to cope with the volume of people & traffic.... I can only envisage total grid lock!!!
2,800 new homes should be allocated on a site away from existing towns, this is a new town which should be positioned on its own, its own right where infrastructure can be laid out in place where it will work, example an 'Odsey Development' by Ashwell Station on A505, a town in its own right, oh but of course that's not North Herts Land you say... Drop the boundaries & plan together!!!
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 222
Received: 21/10/2016
Respondent: M & J Oakley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to spatial distribution: Provide a new settlement of 2,800 homes outside NHDC adjoining Ashwell Station.
In response to the North Herts Development Local plan.
As long term Hertfordshire county council tenant farmers of this land we obviously do not want this development to go ahead!
Living & working the land surrounding Baldock we have been able to provide a valuable service to the surrounding towns, providing a choice of local produce & provide services & facilities for the equestrian leisure industry, on selling off these small holding these valuable businesses will be lost for good! Small holdings on Greenbelt land provides unique businesses to serve rural towns once lost you won't get them back....
In response to the development of Baldock town, this will almost double the size of a attractive & vibrant coaching town completely distorting a already congested centre. I can not see even with putting in a road link from the A507 across the railway line will you be able to ease an already congested road, unless the railway station moves out of the site its at & moves further north it will not be able to cope with the volume of people & traffic.... I can only envisage total grid lock!!!
2,800 new homes should be allocated on a site away from existing towns, this is a new town which should be positioned on its own, its own right where infrastructure can be laid out in place where it will work, example an 'Odsey Development' by Ashwell Station on A505, a town in its own right, oh but of course that's not North Herts Land you say... Drop the boundaries & plan together!!!