Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 3679

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Graham and Jackie Tomlinson

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt;
proposal is inconsistent with the NPPF; and
land is recognised as making a significant contribution to the green belt in the NHDC Green Belt Review.

Object

Representation ID: 3680

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Graham and Jackie Tomlinson

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
the policy is not consistent with the NPPF Section 4 as major infrastructure is required; and
the policy is not consistent with achieving sustainable development for Baldock.

Object

Representation ID: 3688

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Graham and Jackie Tomlinson

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
development of the scale proposed is not consistent with achieving sustainable development for Baldock;
have alternative strategies been considered; and
a significant new settlement is needed to meet future needs.