Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Bellcross Company LTD search
New searchSupport
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP2: Settlement Hierarchy
Representation ID: 6617
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Support SP2: Support principles and that majority of development will be in or adjoining towns
See attachment
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt
Representation ID: 6618
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Support SP5: Principle of Green Belt review and managed release of land outside settlement boundaries
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP6: Sustainable Transport
Representation ID: 6619
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP6: Support principles but criterion d should relate to addressing direct impacts of development. Any measures should consider viability and deliverability.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP7: Infrastructure Requirements and Developer Contributions
Representation ID: 6620
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP7: Support principles of criterion a. Criterion b overly prescriptive and potentially onerous. Criterion f is ambiguous and should refer to viability.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 6621
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP8: Support general thrust of policy. Criterion f should refer to viability.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP17: Site HT1 - Highover Farm, Hitchin
Representation ID: 6622
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP17: Support allocation in principle as landowner / promoter, criterion d (self-build) should be consideration not a requirement, criterion e (school) should be qualified to being subject to future analysis of need and capacity
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy T1: Assessment of transport matters
Representation ID: 6623
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to T1: Broad thrust supported. Criterion d should refer to viability.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy HS2: Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 6624
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to HS2: Criterion a should refer to viability, site specific circumstances to be taken into account, criterion c too specific and should be deleted
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy HS5: Accessible and adaptable housing
Representation ID: 6625
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to HS5: Support motives but site-specific circumstances, viability and existing and future housing stock and needs should be considered when applying
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy D1: Sustainable Design
Representation ID: 6626
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Bellcross Company LTD
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to D1: Support motives but site specific circumstances and viability should be taken into consideration in its application.
See attachment
