Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 3682

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Ian and Beth Hall

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
Development of the scale proposed is not consistent with achieving sustainable development for Baldock;
Have alternative strategies been considered? and
A significant new settlement is needed to meet future needs.

Object

Representation ID: 3683

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Ian and Beth Hall

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
The policy is not consistent with the NPPF Section 4 as major infrastructure is required; and
The policy is not consistent with achieving sustainable development for Baldock.

Object

Representation ID: 3690

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Ian and Beth Hall

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
Loss of green belt;
Proposal is inconsistent with the NPPF; and
Land is recognised as making a significant contribution to the green belt in the NHDC Green Belt Review.