Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mr Thomas Wright search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC1 Land at Duncots Close

Representation ID: 3632

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Thomas Wright

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC1:
- Sewage at capacity
- Loss of Green Belt
- Conflicts with the NPPF

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on the grounds listed below:
a) As far as I can see there has been no consultation regarding sites IC3 and LS1 - surely this is illegal, the local plan is not legally compliant .
b) The main sewer in Ickleford struggles to cope as it is. Development at sites IC1 and IC3 will severely exacerbate this problem. For this reason the local plan is not sound.
c) Sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 are on green belt land - it is there for a reason and planning to build on green belt is in conflict with National Planning Policy Framework - another reason why the plan is not sound.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road

Representation ID: 3633

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Thomas Wright

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC2:
- Loss of Green Belt
- Conflicts with the NPPF

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on the grounds listed below:
a) As far as I can see there has been no consultation regarding sites IC3 and LS1 - surely this is illegal, the local plan is not legally compliant .
b) The main sewer in Ickleford struggles to cope as it is. Development at sites IC1 and IC3 will severely exacerbate this problem. For this reason the local plan is not sound.
c) Sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 are on green belt land - it is there for a reason and planning to build on green belt is in conflict with National Planning Policy Framework - another reason why the plan is not sound.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC3 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 3634

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Thomas Wright

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC3:
- No prior consultation
- Sewage at capacity
- Loss of Green Belt
- Conflicts with the NPPF

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on the grounds listed below:
a) As far as I can see there has been no consultation regarding sites IC3 and LS1 - surely this is illegal, the local plan is not legally compliant .
b) The main sewer in Ickleford struggles to cope as it is. Development at sites IC1 and IC3 will severely exacerbate this problem. For this reason the local plan is not sound.
c) Sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 are on green belt land - it is there for a reason and planning to build on green belt is in conflict with National Planning Policy Framework - another reason why the plan is not sound.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

LS1 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 3635

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Thomas Wright

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to LS1:
- No prior consultation

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on the grounds listed below:
a) As far as I can see there has been no consultation regarding sites IC3 and LS1 - surely this is illegal, the local plan is not legally compliant .
b) The main sewer in Ickleford struggles to cope as it is. Development at sites IC1 and IC3 will severely exacerbate this problem. For this reason the local plan is not sound.
c) Sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 are on green belt land - it is there for a reason and planning to build on green belt is in conflict with National Planning Policy Framework - another reason why the plan is not sound.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.