Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Victoria Witting search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
LS1 Land at Bedford Road
Representation ID: 3340
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Victoria Witting
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to LS1:
- Loss of Green Belt and no "exceptional circumstances"
- Not consistent with the NPPF
- No prior consultation on IC3 and LS1
- Relocation of the school
I believe that the local plan impacting Ickleford village need reviewing.
My concerns are made in a personal capacity and centre on the lack of consultation and conflict with existing policy.
On sites IC1, IC2 & IC3 the local plan is " Not Sound" as it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework and the NHDC Strategic Objectives on the Green Belt.
Also I believe Green Belt can only be used in "exceptional circumstances" and that has yet to be proven in this case.
On site IC3 and LS1 the local plan is not legally compliant as there was no consultation on these sites.
Also on site IC3 relocating the school is "Not Sound" as it would destroy the centre of the village, contrary to the NHDC policy to protect historic villages.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC3 Land at Bedford Road
Representation ID: 3341
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Victoria Witting
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to IC3:
- Loss of Green Belt and no "exceptional circumstances"
- Not consistent with the NPPF
- No prior consultation on IC3 and LS1
- Relocation of the school
I believe that the local plan impacting Ickleford village need reviewing.
My concerns are made in a personal capacity and centre on the lack of consultation and conflict with existing policy.
On sites IC1, IC2 & IC3 the local plan is " Not Sound" as it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework and the NHDC Strategic Objectives on the Green Belt.
Also I believe Green Belt can only be used in "exceptional circumstances" and that has yet to be proven in this case.
On site IC3 and LS1 the local plan is not legally compliant as there was no consultation on these sites.
Also on site IC3 relocating the school is "Not Sound" as it would destroy the centre of the village, contrary to the NHDC policy to protect historic villages.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road
Representation ID: 3342
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Victoria Witting
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to IC2:
- Loss of Green Belt and no "exceptional circumstances"
- Not consistent with the NPPF
- Relocation of the school
I believe that the local plan impacting Ickleford village need reviewing.
My concerns are made in a personal capacity and centre on the lack of consultation and conflict with existing policy.
On sites IC1, IC2 & IC3 the local plan is " Not Sound" as it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework and the NHDC Strategic Objectives on the Green Belt.
Also I believe Green Belt can only be used in "exceptional circumstances" and that has yet to be proven in this case.
On site IC3 and LS1 the local plan is not legally compliant as there was no consultation on these sites.
Also on site IC3 relocating the school is "Not Sound" as it would destroy the centre of the village, contrary to the NHDC policy to protect historic villages.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC1 Land at Duncots Close
Representation ID: 3343
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Victoria Witting
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to IC1:
- Loss of Green Belt and no "exceptional circumstances"
- Not consistent with the NPPF
- Relocation of the school
I believe that the local plan impacting Ickleford village need reviewing.
My concerns are made in a personal capacity and centre on the lack of consultation and conflict with existing policy.
On sites IC1, IC2 & IC3 the local plan is " Not Sound" as it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework and the NHDC Strategic Objectives on the Green Belt.
Also I believe Green Belt can only be used in "exceptional circumstances" and that has yet to be proven in this case.
On site IC3 and LS1 the local plan is not legally compliant as there was no consultation on these sites.
Also on site IC3 relocating the school is "Not Sound" as it would destroy the centre of the village, contrary to the NHDC policy to protect historic villages.
