Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

I am writing to object the planning proposals for IC1,IC2,IC3 and LS1.
My objections are because the local plan is 'not sound' building on green belt, it conflicts with national planning policy framework.
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is not sound due to the main sewer not being able to cope with the current demand and conflicts With the local plan not to build in areas prone to flooding. The drain outside bowmans is often over flowing and cannot cope with heavy rain. I have seen it all bubbling out of the ground on many occasions.
Traffic for all these sites is again 'not sound', it does not account for increased traffic from central Bedfordshire. And on air quality and pollution is again not sound. I am concerned as I am an Ickleford resident and are bringing up three children, which is why I am most upset about the prospect of moving Ickleford village school. This is the heart of the village and is so picturesque. It is also vital for the children as they use the church and village hall which are all so close in proximity. Why not extend out to the back of the school!??? Compulsory purchase the horse field behind, there is plenty of scope to build onto the school that way, but to move it will be a shame to say the least.
I really hope you listen to the residents of Ickleford and you can come to a solution without moving the school.

I am writing to object the planning proposals for IC1,IC2,IC3 and LS1.
My objections are because the local plan is 'not sound' building on green belt, it conflicts with national planning policy framework.
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is not sound due to the main sewer not being able to cope with the current demand and conflicts With the local plan not to build in areas prone to flooding. The drain outside bowmans is often over flowing and cannot cope with heavy rain. I have seen it all bubbling out of the ground on many occasions.
Traffic for all these sites is again 'not sound', it does not account for increased traffic from central Bedfordshire. And on air quality and pollution is again not sound. I am concerned as I am an Ickleford resident and are bringing up three children, which is why I am most upset about the prospect of moving Ickleford village school. This is the heart of the village and is so picturesque. It is also vital for the children as they use the church and village hall which are all so close in proximity. Why not extend out to the back of the school!??? Compulsory purchase the horse field behind, there is plenty of scope to build onto the school that way, but to move it will be a shame to say the least.
I really hope you listen to the residents of Ickleford and you can come to a solution without moving the school.

I am writing to object the planning proposals for IC1,IC2,IC3 and LS1.
My objections are because the local plan is 'not sound' building on green belt, it conflicts with national planning policy framework.
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is not sound due to the main sewer not being able to cope with the current demand and conflicts With the local plan not to build in areas prone to flooding. The drain outside bowmans is often over flowing and cannot cope with heavy rain. I have seen it all bubbling out of the ground on many occasions.
Traffic for all these sites is again 'not sound', it does not account for increased traffic from central Bedfordshire. And on air quality and pollution is again not sound. I am concerned as I am an Ickleford resident and are bringing up three children, which is why I am most upset about the prospect of moving Ickleford village school. This is the heart of the village and is so picturesque. It is also vital for the children as they use the church and village hall which are all so close in proximity. Why not extend out to the back of the school!??? Compulsory purchase the horse field behind, there is plenty of scope to build onto the school that way, but to move it will be a shame to say the least.
I really hope you listen to the residents of Ickleford and you can come to a solution without moving the school.

I am writing to object the planning proposals for IC1,IC2,IC3 and LS1.
My objections are because the local plan is 'not sound' building on green belt, it conflicts with national planning policy framework.
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is not sound due to the main sewer not being able to cope with the current demand and conflicts With the local plan not to build in areas prone to flooding. The drain outside bowmans is often over flowing and cannot cope with heavy rain. I have seen it all bubbling out of the ground on many occasions.
Traffic for all these sites is again 'not sound', it does not account for increased traffic from central Bedfordshire. And on air quality and pollution is again not sound. I am concerned as I am an Ickleford resident and are bringing up three children, which is why I am most upset about the prospect of moving Ickleford village school. This is the heart of the village and is so picturesque. It is also vital for the children as they use the church and village hall which are all so close in proximity. Why not extend out to the back of the school!??? Compulsory purchase the horse field behind, there is plenty of scope to build onto the school that way, but to move it will be a shame to say the least.
I really hope you listen to the residents of Ickleford and you can come to a solution without moving the school.