Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Grant Chivers search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
LS1 Land at Bedford Road
Representation ID: 3007
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Grant Chivers
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to LS1:
1.'Not Sound':
a.NHDC Modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire and conflicts with NHDC transport policy
b.Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality
c.NHDC has not accounted for any impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
2.not 'Legally Compliant':
a.NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site
Site: LS1
As a resident of Ickleford I wish to object to the plans for this site on the following grounds:
1.It is 'Not Sound' as it
a.NHDC Modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire and conflicts with NHDC transport policy
b.Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality
c.NHDC has not accounted for any impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
2.It is not 'Legally Compliant' as:
a.NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC3 Land at Bedford Road
Representation ID: 3008
Received: 30/12/2016
Respondent: Grant Chivers
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object IC3:
1.'Not Sound':
a.Conflicts with NPPF
b.Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt
c.Evidence-main sewer cannot cope with current demand. Site will add to burden
d.Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and reduce the risk of flooding in new areas
e.NHDC Modelling flawed- increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire,conflicts with NHDC transport policy
f.Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy air quality
g.not accounted for impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
h.impact on the village:NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages
2.not 'Legally Compliant:
a.no prior consultation
Site: IC3
As a resident of Ickleford, I wish to object to the plans for this site on the following grounds:
1.It is 'Not Sound' as it
a.Conflicts with the National Planning Policy Framework
b.Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt
c.Evidence shows that the main sewer cannot cope with current demand. This site will add to this burden
d.Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to the reduce the risk of flooding in new areas
e.NHDC Modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire and conflicts with NHDC transport policy
f.Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality
g.NHDC has not accounted for any impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
h.The consequent impact on the village conflicts with NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages
2.It is not 'Legally Compliant' as:
a.NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC1 Land at Duncots Close
Representation ID: 3010
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Grant Chivers
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Objection to IC1:
1. 'Not Sound:
a. Conflicts with NPPF
b. Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt
c. Evidence - main sewer cannot cope with current demand. This site will add to this burden
d. Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to reduce the risk of flooding in new areas
e. NHDC Modelling is flawed -does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire, conflicts with NHDC transport policy
f. Increased traffic pollution conflicts NHDC policy on air quality
g. not accounted for impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
Site: IC1
As a resident of Ickleford, I wish to object to the plans for this site on the following grounds:
1. It is 'Not Sound' as it
a. Conflicts with the National Planning Policy Framework
b. Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt
c. Evidence shows that the main sewer cannot cope with current demand. This site will add to this burden
d. Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to the reduce the risk of flooding in new areas
e. NHDC Modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire and conflicts with NHDC transport policy
f. Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality
g. NHDC has not accounted for any impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road
Representation ID: 3011
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Grant Chivers
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Objection to IC2:
1.It is 'Not Sound' as it
a.Conflicts with the National Planning Policy Framework
b.Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt
c.NHDC Modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire and conflicts with NHDC transport policy
d.Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality
e.NHDC has not accounted for any impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
Site: IC2
As a resident of Ickleford, I wish to object to the plans for this site on the following grounds:
1.It is 'Not Sound' as it
a.Conflicts with the National Planning Policy Framework
b.Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt
c.NHDC Modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire and conflicts with NHDC transport policy
d.Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality
e.NHDC has not accounted for any impact associated with the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan
