Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mr Peter Farrell search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP19: Sites EL1, EL2 and EL3 - East of Luton

Representation ID: 2489

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Peter Farrell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt;
brownfield sites should be used; and
congestion through Stopsley to M1, A5, A505.

Full text:

There is no need to destroy Green Belt land for this development as there is plenty of Brown Field sites for building on. I live in Stopsley & the traffic situation every morning is horrendous. How many roads are there out of Cockernoe? The hole area will be gridlocked trying to get to the M1 the 5a05 the A5 & the roads to Dunstable & Bedford. This is all being ignored by the NHDC page 72 para.222. saying that the level of development can be accommodated without a significant adverse impact on the wider highway networks of Luton & Herts. Who do they think they are kidding. I could go on for hours with my objection but think I have made my views clear. STOP this DEVELOPMENT Now

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt

Representation ID: 2490

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Peter Farrell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt;
brownfield sites should be used; and
congestion through Stopsley to M1, A5, A505.

Full text:

There is no need to destroy Green Belt land for this development as there is plenty of Brown Field sites for building on. I live in Stopsley & the traffic situation every morning is horrendous. How many roads are there out of Cockernoe? The hole area will be gridlocked trying to get to the M1 the 5a05 the A5 & the roads to Dunstable & Bedford. This is all being ignored by the NHDC page 72 para.222. saying that the level of development can be accommodated without a significant adverse impact on the wider highway networks of Luton & Herts. Who do they think they are kidding. I could go on for hours with my objection but think I have made my views clear. STOP this DEVELOPMENT Now

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.