Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Ms S James search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC1 Land at Duncots Close

Representation ID: 3541

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms S James

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to ICI: Green Belt, NPPF, no traffic surveys, no cumulative impact with Central Beds.

Full text:

I object to ICI, IC2,IC3 as not sound and conflict with NHDC strategic policies on Greenbelt and National Planning Policy Framework

I object to IC3 and LSI for no prior consultation - Not Legally Compliant -as NHDC did not allow prior consultation.

I object to sites ICI, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not sound regarding no traffic surveys to allow from central beds traffic along Bedford road to further congest Hitchin traffic which is already problematic at peak hours.

Site IC3 is Not sound nor acceptable in terms of relocating a listed village school which is the heart and soul of a village which NHDC policy claims to protect and enhance the character of.

I finally object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not Sound as no impact or connection with central beds local plan has been made apparent.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road

Representation ID: 3542

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms S James

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC2: Green Belt, NPPF, no traffic surveys, no cumulative impact with Central Beds.

Full text:

I object to ICI, IC2,IC3 as not sound and conflict with NHDC strategic policies on Greenbelt and National Planning Policy Framework

I object to IC3 and LSI for no prior consultation - Not Legally Compliant -as NHDC did not allow prior consultation.

I object to sites ICI, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not sound regarding no traffic surveys to allow from central beds traffic along Bedford road to further congest Hitchin traffic which is already problematic at peak hours.

Site IC3 is Not sound nor acceptable in terms of relocating a listed village school which is the heart and soul of a village which NHDC policy claims to protect and enhance the character of.

I finally object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not Sound as no impact or connection with central beds local plan has been made apparent.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC3 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 3543

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms S James

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC3: Green Belt, NPPF, no prior consultation, no traffic surveys, school relocation, no cumulative impact with Central Beds.

Full text:

I object to ICI, IC2,IC3 as not sound and conflict with NHDC strategic policies on Greenbelt and National Planning Policy Framework

I object to IC3 and LSI for no prior consultation - Not Legally Compliant -as NHDC did not allow prior consultation.

I object to sites ICI, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not sound regarding no traffic surveys to allow from central beds traffic along Bedford road to further congest Hitchin traffic which is already problematic at peak hours.

Site IC3 is Not sound nor acceptable in terms of relocating a listed village school which is the heart and soul of a village which NHDC policy claims to protect and enhance the character of.

I finally object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not Sound as no impact or connection with central beds local plan has been made apparent.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

LS1 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 3544

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms S James

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to LS1: no prior consultation, no traffic surveys, no cumulative impact with central beds.

Full text:

I object to ICI, IC2,IC3 as not sound and conflict with NHDC strategic policies on Greenbelt and National Planning Policy Framework

I object to IC3 and LSI for no prior consultation - Not Legally Compliant -as NHDC did not allow prior consultation.

I object to sites ICI, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not sound regarding no traffic surveys to allow from central beds traffic along Bedford road to further congest Hitchin traffic which is already problematic at peak hours.

Site IC3 is Not sound nor acceptable in terms of relocating a listed village school which is the heart and soul of a village which NHDC policy claims to protect and enhance the character of.

I finally object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LSI as Not Sound as no impact or connection with central beds local plan has been made apparent.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.