Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Rumball Sedgwick search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy ETC5: Secondary Shopping Frontages
Representation ID: 6107
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to ETC5: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy ETC6: Local Centres
Representation ID: 6108
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to ETC6: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy ETC7: Scattered local shops and services in towns and villages
Representation ID: 6109
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to ETC7: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt
Representation ID: 6110
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP5: Green Belt type-controls imposed in non Green Belt areas, presumption against development
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy CGB1: Rural Areas beyond the Green Belt
Representation ID: 6111
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB1: Imposition of restrictive Green Belt-type controls in the rural areas, indistinguishable from Green Belt policy
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy CGB2: Exception sites in rural areas
Representation ID: 6112
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB2: Unnecessarily duplicates national policy
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy CGB3: Rural Workers' Dwellings
Representation ID: 6113
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB3: unnecessarily duplicates national policy
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy CGB4: Existing rural buildings
Representation ID: 6114
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB4: unnecessarily duplicates national policy, overtaken by permitted development rights
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy T1: Assessment of transport matters
Representation ID: 6115
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to T1: Adds nothing to NPPF
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy T2: Parking
Representation ID: 6116
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to T2: Not appropriate to insist on minimum standards where public transport is adequate
See attached
