Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Ms Nicolette Amette search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
KB1 Land at Deards End
Representation ID: 1812
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to KB1: The plan does not represent the best interests of the district, infrastructure provision for transport/highway, waste management and water supply
The plan does not represent the best interests of the district. This is a small historic village.
The infrastructure provision for transport, waste management and water supply has
not been fully thought out. Problems with the width of the roads. Lanes are too narrow to cope with significant traffic.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
KB2 Land off Gypsy Lane
Representation ID: 1816
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Object to KB2: Green Belt, Loss of country side and impact on landscape Character. Highway infrastructure. Flood risk.
Green Belt land makes a significant contribution to protecting spaces between towns and maintaining the separate identity of Knebworth as a village. Development of sites KB2 will remove the Green Belt buffer between the village and the A1. There will be a loss of countryside damaging the open landscape setting.
Plus, the width of the road under the railways is a problem.
Lack of draining/inadequate drainage is a problem too.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
KB3 Chas Lowe site, London Road
Representation ID: 1824
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to KB3: No proposal for any commercial use, development in the village centers should contain a mixed use policy.
As there is no proposal for any commercial use it is evidence of a lack of strategy for Knebworth. The village centre will be changed and this will have an impact. The facilities of Knebworth are designated as a village centre in the retail hierarchy under policy SP4. Therefore, any development of the village centre needs to take this into account. At a bare minimum, some mixed use should be proposed.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Knebworth
Representation ID: 1828
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to Knebworth in general: scale of development is too large for the village. Lack of highway, transport and community infrastructure. Many area's flood in wet weather and plans are not well thought out.
Knebworth is a small village. It's infrastructure can not cope with this amount of development. The roads are too narrow, the station is already dangerously overcrowded, as is the doctors surgery and school. Many area's flood in wet weather and plans are not well thought out.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
KB4 Land east of Knebworth
Representation ID: 1830
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to KB4: There has been no consultation about the development of this site. The village infrastructure can not cope with this development.
There has been no consultation about the development of this site. The village infrastructure can not cope with this development.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
KB2 Land off Gypsy Lane
Representation ID: 1834
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to KB2: The idea of a school on this site isn't reasonable or sound
A second primary school on site KB2 is not well considered. This would be adjacent
to the A1 and as such noise and air pollution will be significant. Children and
teachers cannot learn and teach in this environment. In December 2014 the Environmental Audit Committee issued a report stating that: 'A ban on building schools, hospitals, and care homes near air pollution hotspots must be introduced to
help cut thousands of deaths connected to the 'invisible killer' of traffic fumes.' A second primary school will change the village feel of Knebworth to more of a town, or urban sprawl. It will increase pressure on the roads under on the railway bridges because more people would be crossing the village each morning, in both directions, with young children. I would be naïve to assume that parents would automatically chose the primary school nearest to them, or on their side of the village.