Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Ms Nicolette Amette search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

KB1 Land at Deards End

Representation ID: 1812

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to KB1: The plan does not represent the best interests of the district, infrastructure provision for transport/highway, waste management and water supply

Full text:

The plan does not represent the best interests of the district. This is a small historic village.
The infrastructure provision for transport, waste management and water supply has
not been fully thought out. Problems with the width of the roads. Lanes are too narrow to cope with significant traffic.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

KB2 Land off Gypsy Lane

Representation ID: 1816

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Object to KB2: Green Belt, Loss of country side and impact on landscape Character. Highway infrastructure. Flood risk.

Full text:

Green Belt land makes a significant contribution to protecting spaces between towns and maintaining the separate identity of Knebworth as a village. Development of sites KB2 will remove the Green Belt buffer between the village and the A1. There will be a loss of countryside damaging the open landscape setting.
Plus, the width of the road under the railways is a problem.
Lack of draining/inadequate drainage is a problem too.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

KB3 Chas Lowe site, London Road

Representation ID: 1824

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to KB3: No proposal for any commercial use, development in the village centers should contain a mixed use policy.

Full text:

As there is no proposal for any commercial use it is evidence of a lack of strategy for Knebworth. The village centre will be changed and this will have an impact. The facilities of Knebworth are designated as a village centre in the retail hierarchy under policy SP4. Therefore, any development of the village centre needs to take this into account. At a bare minimum, some mixed use should be proposed.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Knebworth

Representation ID: 1828

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to Knebworth in general: scale of development is too large for the village. Lack of highway, transport and community infrastructure. Many area's flood in wet weather and plans are not well thought out.

Full text:

Knebworth is a small village. It's infrastructure can not cope with this amount of development. The roads are too narrow, the station is already dangerously overcrowded, as is the doctors surgery and school. Many area's flood in wet weather and plans are not well thought out.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

KB4 Land east of Knebworth

Representation ID: 1830

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to KB4: There has been no consultation about the development of this site. The village infrastructure can not cope with this development.

Full text:

There has been no consultation about the development of this site. The village infrastructure can not cope with this development.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

KB2 Land off Gypsy Lane

Representation ID: 1834

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Nicolette Amette

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to KB2: The idea of a school on this site isn't reasonable or sound

Full text:

A second primary school on site KB2 is not well considered. This would be adjacent
to the A1 and as such noise and air pollution will be significant. Children and
teachers cannot learn and teach in this environment. In December 2014 the Environmental Audit Committee issued a report stating that: 'A ban on building schools, hospitals, and care homes near air pollution hotspots must be introduced to
help cut thousands of deaths connected to the 'invisible killer' of traffic fumes.' A second primary school will change the village feel of Knebworth to more of a town, or urban sprawl. It will increase pressure on the roads under on the railway bridges because more people would be crossing the village each morning, in both directions, with young children. I would be naïve to assume that parents would automatically chose the primary school nearest to them, or on their side of the village.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.