Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Ms Linda Aird search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC1 Land at Duncots Close
Representation ID: 1778
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Linda Aird
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Objection to IC1 on the grounds of:
Not sound for the following reasons :
Main sewer can't cope with current demand, adding to this will burden it further.
Conflicts with policies not to develop in land prone to flooding.
Conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework.
Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.
NHDC modelling doesn't account for increased traffic from central Beds, conflicts with NHDC policy on transport, and thus also NHDC policy on air quality.
No account taken of impact associated with Central Beds Local Plan.
Not sound for the following reasons :
Main sewer can't cope with current demand, adding to this will burden it further.
Conflicts with policies not to develop in land prone to flooding.
Conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework.
Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.
NHDC modelling doesn't account for increased traffic from central Beds, conflicts with NHDC policy on transport, and thus also NHDC policy on air quality.
No account taken of impact associated with Central Beds Local Plan.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC3 Land at Bedford Road
Representation ID: 1791
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Linda Aird
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to IC3: Green Belt, flood risk areas, community infrastructure, highway facilities, impact of Central Beds Local Plan, Historic character of villages.
Not sound for the following reasons:
Conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework.
Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.
Flooding danger - main sewer cannot cope with current demand, further burdens on it from more development could be disastrous. Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new developments.
'Not legally compliant' because NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site.
Traffic - NHDC modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Beds and conflicts with NHDC policy on transport - increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.
Proposed relocation of the school - consequent impact on the village conflicts with NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages.
Lack of coordination with neighbouring authorities, NHDC have not accounted for any impact associated with Central Beds Local Plan.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road
Representation ID: 1794
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Ms Linda Aird
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to IC2: Green belt, transport assessment, air quality, impact of Central Beds local plan on NHDC.
Not sound for the following reasons:
Conflicts with National Policy Framework.
Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.
Traffic modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Beds. Conflicts with NHDC policy of transport.
Increased traffic pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.
NHDC have not accounted for any impact associated with the Central Beds local plan.