Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

There is an absence of justification for the excessive housing target that does not take into proper account of Green Belt constraints and in many cases. The current framework makes it very clear Green Belt boundaries should only be adjusted when very special circumstances exist, through the Local plan and with the support of local people. The need for additional housing alone does not constitute exceptional circumstances for rolling back further the green belt around the towns on the A1M corridor.

There is an absence of justification for the excessive housing target that does not take into proper account of Green Belt constraints and in many cases. The current framework makes it very clear Green Belt boundaries should only be adjusted when very special circumstances exist, through the Local plan and with the support of local people. The need for additional housing alone does not constitute exceptional circumstances for rolling back further the green belt around the towns on the A1M corridor.
The North of Stevenage already had a large area removed from the green belt for Great Ashby as exceptional circumstances to meet Stevenage housing need during the last local plan, and now is expected to do so again. NS1, GA1 and GA2 will close the gap between Graveley and Stevenage with Weston and will fully immerse Chesfield losing the character of all villages and hamlets.
The development sites NS1 (900 dwellings), GA1 (330 dwellings), GA2 (600 dwellings) are to meet the needs of Stevenage which itself has a developing local plan for 7600 new homes during 2011 and 2031. There also plans for 600 dwellings to the East of Stevenage in East Herts local plan. This constitutes an increase of 10030 homes or 11% increase to meet the needs of Stevenage alone. This is a similar proposal to what was included in the now defunct SNAP, which indicated a relief road for a development of this size, yet this is not indicated in the local plan, and relies on funnelling traffic through existing roads not designed to cope with such an increase in traffic. All of these sites are away from the main town centre, public transport does not link these sites together so will increase car journeys and commuting outside of the town further exacerbating the daily issues on the A1M and rail network.

Further for the sites GA1 and GA2 do not address the needs of residents of Great Ashby, who do not have a local GP surgery, and oversubscribed 2FE primary school which serves an area a 1/3 of the size of the development, no secondary school, and a widely acknowledged issue on the road network with the planning policies of the past. These two new sites are popular recreation areas for dog walkers, ramblers, with many walks crossing the sites, and extend into the Green Belt. At present Tileklin Wood and Brooches Wood provide a highly defensible Green Belt boundary to Great Ashby along the eastern boundary of the proposed GA2 site, the western and southern boundaries are not as defensible. Brooches Wood has a large range of biodiversity and again is an important recreation area and biodiverse - deer and badger join the abundance of flora and fauna, isolating this important area within the current Great Ashby and proposed GA2 will have a significant impact. Great Ashby needs these areas to remain as is, particularly important following recent proposals to remove a number of play areas within Great Ashby itself.

I would like to object to the local plan, specifically the lack of justification for the excessive housing target, lack of associated infrastructure that a local plan of this size requires and further rolling back of the Green Belt (or land swaps) around the A1M towns of Stevenage, Hitchin, Baldock and Letchworth. Instead I would support that NHDC and Stevenage Borough Council deliver a sensitively designed new Garden city, to support additional and justified housing need in the area, local employment can be generated and where the local infrastructure is adequately considered and delivered.

There is an absence of justification for the excessive housing target that does not take into proper account of Green Belt constraints and in many cases. The current framework makes it very clear Green Belt boundaries should only be adjusted when very special circumstances exist, through the Local plan and with the support of local people. The need for additional housing alone does not constitute exceptional circumstances for rolling back further the green belt around the towns on the A1M corridor.
The North of Stevenage already had a large area removed from the green belt for Great Ashby as exceptional circumstances to meet Stevenage housing need during the last local plan, and now is expected to do so again. NS1, GA1 and GA2 will close the gap between Graveley and Stevenage with Weston and will fully immerse Chesfield losing the character of all villages and hamlets.
The development sites NS1 (900 dwellings), GA1 (330 dwellings), GA2 (600 dwellings) are to meet the needs of Stevenage which itself has a developing local plan for 7600 new homes during 2011 and 2031. There also plans for 600 dwellings to the East of Stevenage in East Herts local plan. This constitutes an increase of 10030 homes or 11% increase to meet the needs of Stevenage alone. This is a similar proposal to what was included in the now defunct SNAP, which indicated a relief road for a development of this size, yet this is not indicated in the local plan, and relies on funnelling traffic through existing roads not designed to cope with such an increase in traffic. All of these sites are away from the main town centre, public transport does not link these sites together so will increase car journeys and commuting outside of the town further exacerbating the daily issues on the A1M and rail network.

I would like to object to the local plan, specifically the lack of justification for the excessive housing target, lack of associated infrastructure that a local plan of this size requires and further rolling back of the Green Belt (or land swaps) around the A1M towns of Stevenage, Hitchin, Baldock and Letchworth. Instead I would support that NHDC and Stevenage Borough Council deliver a sensitively designed new Garden city, to support additional and justified housing need in the area, local employment can be generated and where the local infrastructure is adequately considered and delivered.

There is an absence of justification for the excessive housing target that does not take into proper account of Green Belt constraints and in many cases. The current framework makes it very clear Green Belt boundaries should only be adjusted when very special circumstances exist, through the Local plan and with the support of local people. The need for additional housing alone does not constitute exceptional circumstances for rolling back further the green belt around the towns on the A1M corridor.
The North of Stevenage already had a large area removed from the green belt for Great Ashby as exceptional circumstances to meet Stevenage housing need during the last local plan, and now is expected to do so again. NS1, GA1 and GA2 will close the gap between Graveley and Stevenage with Weston and will fully immerse Chesfield losing the character of all villages and hamlets.
The development sites NS1 (900 dwellings), GA1 (330 dwellings), GA2 (600 dwellings) are to meet the needs of Stevenage which itself has a developing local plan for 7600 new homes during 2011 and 2031. There also plans for 600 dwellings to the East of Stevenage in East Herts local plan. This constitutes an increase of 10030 homes or 11% increase to meet the needs of Stevenage alone. This is a similar proposal to what was included in the now defunct SNAP, which indicated a relief road for a development of this size, yet this is not indicated in the local plan, and relies on funnelling traffic through existing roads not designed to cope with such an increase in traffic. All of these sites are away from the main town centre, public transport does not link these sites together so will increase car journeys and commuting outside of the town further exacerbating the daily issues on the A1M and rail network.

I would like to object to the local plan, specifically the lack of justification for the excessive housing target, lack of associated infrastructure that a local plan of this size requires and further rolling back of the Green Belt (or land swaps) around the A1M towns of Stevenage, Hitchin, Baldock and Letchworth. Instead I would support that NHDC and Stevenage Borough Council deliver a sensitively designed new Garden city, to support additional and justified housing need in the area, local employment can be generated and where the local infrastructure is adequately considered and delivered.

There is an absence of justification for the excessive housing target that does not take into proper account of Green Belt constraints and in many cases. The current framework makes it very clear Green Belt boundaries should only be adjusted when very special circumstances exist, through the Local plan and with the support of local people. The need for additional housing alone does not constitute exceptional circumstances for rolling back further the green belt around the towns on the A1M corridor.
The North of Stevenage already had a large area removed from the green belt for Great Ashby as exceptional circumstances to meet Stevenage housing need during the last local plan, and now is expected to do so again. NS1, GA1 and GA2 will close the gap between Graveley and Stevenage with Weston and will fully immerse Chesfield losing the character of all villages and hamlets.
The development sites NS1 (900 dwellings), GA1 (330 dwellings), GA2 (600 dwellings) are to meet the needs of Stevenage which itself has a developing local plan for 7600 new homes during 2011 and 2031. There also plans for 600 dwellings to the East of Stevenage in East Herts local plan. This constitutes an increase of 10030 homes or 11% increase to meet the needs of Stevenage alone. This is a similar proposal to what was included in the now defunct SNAP, which indicated a relief road for a development of this size, yet this is not indicated in the local plan, and relies on funnelling traffic through existing roads not designed to cope with such an increase in traffic. All of these sites are away from the main town centre, public transport does not link these sites together so will increase car journeys and commuting outside of the town further exacerbating the daily issues on the A1M and rail network.