Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mrs Pamela Taylor search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Codicote

Representation ID: 3401

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Taylor

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to Codicote (in general):
- Highway infrastructure and capacity
- Sustainability
- Building on the Green Belt
- Scale of development
- Education facilities
- Healthcare facilities

Full text:

My husband and I are most alarmed by the N.Herts District's proposed plans for the Codicote area for the following reasons:-

1. Traffic. Our roads are already congested and dangerous and will become even more so.

2. Sustainability. Codicote shows the lowest level of sustainable travel of all the preferred housing development areas in the district.

3. Green Belt. These plans go against the Government's aim to prevent urban sprawl.

4. Housing Numbers. The proposed number of new homes represents an increase of circa 36% and this is unsustainable and unjustified.

5. Schooling issues and health care have not been thought-through. Neither would be able to cope with all the extra families.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP8: Housing

Representation ID: 5302

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Taylor

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to Codicote (in general):
- Highway infrastructure and capacity
- Sustainability
- Building on the Green Belt
- Scale of development
- Education facilities
- Healthcare facilities

Full text:

My husband and I are most alarmed by the N.Herts District's proposed plans for the Codicote area for the following reasons:-

1. Traffic. Our roads are already congested and dangerous and will become even more so.

2. Sustainability. Codicote shows the lowest level of sustainable travel of all the preferred housing development areas in the district.

3. Green Belt. These plans go against the Government's aim to prevent urban sprawl.

4. Housing Numbers. The proposed number of new homes represents an increase of circa 36% and this is unsustainable and unjustified.

5. Schooling issues and health care have not been thought-through. Neither would be able to cope with all the extra families.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.