Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mrs Pamela Taylor search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Codicote
Representation ID: 3401
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Taylor
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to Codicote (in general):
- Highway infrastructure and capacity
- Sustainability
- Building on the Green Belt
- Scale of development
- Education facilities
- Healthcare facilities
My husband and I are most alarmed by the N.Herts District's proposed plans for the Codicote area for the following reasons:-
1. Traffic. Our roads are already congested and dangerous and will become even more so.
2. Sustainability. Codicote shows the lowest level of sustainable travel of all the preferred housing development areas in the district.
3. Green Belt. These plans go against the Government's aim to prevent urban sprawl.
4. Housing Numbers. The proposed number of new homes represents an increase of circa 36% and this is unsustainable and unjustified.
5. Schooling issues and health care have not been thought-through. Neither would be able to cope with all the extra families.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 5302
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Taylor
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to Codicote (in general):
- Highway infrastructure and capacity
- Sustainability
- Building on the Green Belt
- Scale of development
- Education facilities
- Healthcare facilities
My husband and I are most alarmed by the N.Herts District's proposed plans for the Codicote area for the following reasons:-
1. Traffic. Our roads are already congested and dangerous and will become even more so.
2. Sustainability. Codicote shows the lowest level of sustainable travel of all the preferred housing development areas in the district.
3. Green Belt. These plans go against the Government's aim to prevent urban sprawl.
4. Housing Numbers. The proposed number of new homes represents an increase of circa 36% and this is unsustainable and unjustified.
5. Schooling issues and health care have not been thought-through. Neither would be able to cope with all the extra families.