Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mrs Anne Sinclair search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP14: Site BA1 - North of Baldock
Representation ID: 685
Received: 22/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Anne Sinclair
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to SP14: Inconsistent with definition of Bygrave as a Category C settlement
If Bygrave is a village in the Green Belt and only allocated limited affordable housing as a Category C Settlement, how is it that such a huge development can take place in Bygrave Parish?
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP14: Site BA1 - North of Baldock
Representation ID: 1388
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Anne Sinclair
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Objection to BA1:
- "Cat Ditch" is the only natural water source for Bygrave, field drainage may be interrupted by the suggested link road (d) Pedestrian routes to Baldock to cross this new road may provide even more of a challenge than the present road does, which also has Heritage Verge Seed Bank.
"Cat Ditch" is the only natural water source for Bygrave, field drainage may be interrupted by the suggested link road (d) Pedestrian routes to Baldock to cross this new road may provide even more of a challenge than the present road does, which also has Heritage Verge Seed Bank.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 1626
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Anne Sinclair
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to SP8 in relation to Baldock:
- impact on ancient market town
- scale of development
- non-existent shopping centre
- needs to be a boundary between the new town and Baldock
As a grandmother to have homes for grandchildren, good, but to have a New Town which maybe larger than Baldock SP14 and adjacent to it will destroy this ancient market town by sheer numbers of people shopping at the non-existent shopping centre created when Tesco moved in here.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Bygrave
Representation ID: 2564
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Anne Sinclair
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to Bygrave in general):
- I noticed there was no provision in the Local Plan for our aging population such as nursing homes or pensioners residences of any kind. I hope this will be rectified before passing this plan.
Thank you for allowing the online method for a grandmother to have her say. I found the whole dictionary of "Speak" extremely difficult to understand. To submit was like a puzzle which I could not solve without pressing buttons. As a result I feel I have not been heard as a Bygrave resident (of very few people here).
I noticed there was no provision in the Local Plan for our aging population such as nursing homes or pensioners residences of any kind. I hope this will be rectified before passing this plan.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP14: Site BA1 - North of Baldock
Representation ID: 5649
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Anne Sinclair
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Object to SP14 BA1:
- impact on ancient market town
- scale of development
- non-existent shopping centre
- needs to be a boundary between the new town and Baldock
As a grandmother to have homes for grandchildren, good, but to have a New Town which maybe larger than Baldock SP14 and adjacent to it will destroy this ancient market town by sheer numbers of people shopping at the non-existent shopping centre created when Tesco moved in here.
