Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mr Jack Busby search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
AS1 Land west of Claybush Road
Representation ID: 646
Received: 22/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Jack Busby
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to AS1: Highway safety, impact on valued landscapes, heritage impacts, inadequate response to previous representations
I object to the draft consultation and the inclusion of site AS1 on several grounds based on the soundness of the NHDC Local Plan.
These objections can be summarised as
*Site AS1 fails to meet the requirements for highway safety to protect pedestrians and other road users as defined in both National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and NHDC's own current and emerging planning policy for Highway Safety (Policy T1).
*Site AS1 fails to meet the requirements to protect valued landscapes. The site is within the North Baldock Chalk Uplands Character Area and development is restricted under National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and NHDC's own local planning policy, both current and emerging.
*Site AS1 fails to meet the requirements to protect the historic environment. The site is within the setting of the scheduled ancient monument Arbury Banks and is protected by NPPF and NHDC policy (SP13, para 4.151).
*NHDC has failed to consult on the proposals to extend the settlement boundary in locations other than AS1 (within which there would be a presumption in favour of development; Policy SP2) and has not responded adequately to previous representations.
I do not support the allocation of site AS1.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP2: Settlement Hierarchy
Representation ID: 3575
Received: 22/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Jack Busby
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP2 (Ashwell): No prior consultation on proposals to extend settlement boundary in locations other than AS1,
I object to the draft consultation and the inclusion of site AS1 on several grounds based on the soundness of the NHDC Local Plan.
These objections can be summarised as
*Site AS1 fails to meet the requirements for highway safety to protect pedestrians and other road users as defined in both National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and NHDC's own current and emerging planning policy for Highway Safety (Policy T1).
*Site AS1 fails to meet the requirements to protect valued landscapes. The site is within the North Baldock Chalk Uplands Character Area and development is restricted under National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and NHDC's own local planning policy, both current and emerging.
*Site AS1 fails to meet the requirements to protect the historic environment. The site is within the setting of the scheduled ancient monument Arbury Banks and is protected by NPPF and NHDC policy (SP13, para 4.151).
*NHDC has failed to consult on the proposals to extend the settlement boundary in locations other than AS1 (within which there would be a presumption in favour of development; Policy SP2) and has not responded adequately to previous representations.
I do not support the allocation of site AS1.
