Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Ms Helen Feehan search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC1 Land at Duncots Close

Representation ID: 617

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Helen Feehan

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC1: Green Belt, wastewater infrastructure capacity, flooding, traffic modeling does not consider increased traffic from C Beds, air quality, cumulative impacts with C Beds plan not considered

Full text:

I have several deep concerns about the effects on Ickleford if the following proposals are agreed.
My objections and concerns are as follows:

1) Building on Green Belt Land
IC1, IC2 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because it conflicts with the NHDC strategic objectives on Green Belt, and also it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework.
2) Sewerage and Flooding
IC1 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because:
Conflict with NHDC policies not to develop on flood prone areas, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new developments.
Evidence shows the main sewer currently cannot cope with demand as it is, IC1and IC3 will make things even worse.
3) Lack of proper consultation
NHDC did not allow prior consultation on sites IC3 and LS1 so the local plan is Not Legally Compliant.
4) Traffic
The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 for the reason that NHDC modelling is flawed as it doesn't account for an increase in traffic from Central Beds, and conflicts with NHDC policy on transport.
5) Air Quality
The Local Plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2 IC3 and LS1 as increased traffic and ensuing pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.
6) Relocation of Ickleford School
The local plan is Not Sound for site IC3 because the impact on the village of moving the school conflicts with NHDC policy on protecting and enhancing the historic character of villages.
7) No Co-ordination with other Local Authorities The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 because NHDC has not taken into account any impact upon the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road

Representation ID: 618

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Helen Feehan

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC2: Green Belt, traffic modeling does not consider increased traffic from C Beds, air quality, cumulative impacts with C Beds plan not considered

Full text:

I have several deep concerns about the effects on Ickleford if the following proposals are agreed.
My objections and concerns are as follows:

1) Building on Green Belt Land
IC1, IC2 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because it conflicts with the NHDC strategic objectives on Green Belt, and also it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework.
2) Sewerage and Flooding
IC1 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because:
Conflict with NHDC policies not to develop on flood prone areas, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new developments.
Evidence shows the main sewer currently cannot cope with demand as it is, IC1and IC3 will make things even worse.
3) Lack of proper consultation
NHDC did not allow prior consultation on sites IC3 and LS1 so the local plan is Not Legally Compliant.
4) Traffic
The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 for the reason that NHDC modelling is flawed as it doesn't account for an increase in traffic from Central Beds, and conflicts with NHDC policy on transport.
5) Air Quality
The Local Plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2 IC3 and LS1 as increased traffic and ensuing pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.
6) Relocation of Ickleford School
The local plan is Not Sound for site IC3 because the impact on the village of moving the school conflicts with NHDC policy on protecting and enhancing the historic character of villages.
7) No Co-ordination with other Local Authorities The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 because NHDC has not taken into account any impact upon the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC3 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 619

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Helen Feehan

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC3: Green Belt, wastewater infrastructure capacity, flooding, no prior consultation, traffic modeling does not consider increased traffic from C Beds, impact of school relocation on village character, air quality, cumulative impacts with C Beds plan not considered

Full text:

I have several deep concerns about the effects on Ickleford if the following proposals are agreed.
My objections and concerns are as follows:

1) Building on Green Belt Land
IC1, IC2 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because it conflicts with the NHDC strategic objectives on Green Belt, and also it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework.
2) Sewerage and Flooding
IC1 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because:
Conflict with NHDC policies not to develop on flood prone areas, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new developments.
Evidence shows the main sewer currently cannot cope with demand as it is, IC1and IC3 will make things even worse.
3) Lack of proper consultation
NHDC did not allow prior consultation on sites IC3 and LS1 so the local plan is Not Legally Compliant.
4) Traffic
The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 for the reason that NHDC modelling is flawed as it doesn't account for an increase in traffic from Central Beds, and conflicts with NHDC policy on transport.
5) Air Quality
The Local Plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2 IC3 and LS1 as increased traffic and ensuing pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.
6) Relocation of Ickleford School
The local plan is Not Sound for site IC3 because the impact on the village of moving the school conflicts with NHDC policy on protecting and enhancing the historic character of villages.
7) No Co-ordination with other Local Authorities The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 because NHDC has not taken into account any impact upon the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

LS1 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 620

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Helen Feehan

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to LS1: No prior consultation, traffic modeling does not consider increased traffic from C Beds, air quality, cumulative impacts with C Beds plan not considered

Full text:

I have several deep concerns about the effects on Ickleford if the following proposals are agreed.
My objections and concerns are as follows:

1) Building on Green Belt Land
IC1, IC2 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because it conflicts with the NHDC strategic objectives on Green Belt, and also it conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework.
2) Sewerage and Flooding
IC1 and IC3. The local plan is not sound because:
Conflict with NHDC policies not to develop on flood prone areas, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new developments.
Evidence shows the main sewer currently cannot cope with demand as it is, IC1and IC3 will make things even worse.
3) Lack of proper consultation
NHDC did not allow prior consultation on sites IC3 and LS1 so the local plan is Not Legally Compliant.
4) Traffic
The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 for the reason that NHDC modelling is flawed as it doesn't account for an increase in traffic from Central Beds, and conflicts with NHDC policy on transport.
5) Air Quality
The Local Plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2 IC3 and LS1 as increased traffic and ensuing pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.
6) Relocation of Ickleford School
The local plan is Not Sound for site IC3 because the impact on the village of moving the school conflicts with NHDC policy on protecting and enhancing the historic character of villages.
7) No Co-ordination with other Local Authorities The local plan is Not Sound for sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 because NHDC has not taken into account any impact upon the Central Bedfordshire Local Plan.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.