Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Steven Worley search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

HT1 Land at Highover Farm

Representation ID: 621

Received: 22/11/2016

Respondent: Steven Worley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Objection to HT1 on the grounds of:
- road congestion on roads leading into Hitchin town centre, peak periods
- parking within town centre and at the station

Full text:

I am concerned about the knock on effects of such a big development on congestion on the roads leading into Hitchin town centre, especially around points which are already log jammed during peak periods (eg. Cambridge Road, Nightingale Road, Walsworth Road and the Railway Station). I am also concerned about the impact on parking provision within the town centre as well as at Hitchin Station.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

HT11 Churchgate and its surrounding area

Representation ID: 629

Received: 22/11/2016

Respondent: Steven Worley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Object to HT11: Additional retail unnecessary, traffic, impact on quality of life and parking, will be an eyesore if unsuccessful

Full text:

I am concerned about plans for expanded retail development which I consider unnecessary for the needs of the town's residents. We do not need more coffee shops and restaurants. If succesful, this plan will have the effect of attracting additional car traffic with an adverse impact on the quality of life and available parking. If unsuccessful, the town will be left with the eyesore of closed retail units with to let signs.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

HT12 Paynes Park

Representation ID: 640

Received: 22/11/2016

Respondent: Steven Worley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Object to HT12: Additional retail unnecessary, traffic, impact on quality of life and parking, will be an eyesore if unsuccessful

Full text:

I am concerned about plans for expanded retail development which I consider unnecessary for the needs of the town's residents. We do not need more coffee shops and restaurants. If successful, this plan will have the effect of attracting additional car traffic with an adverse impact on the quality of life and available parking. If unsuccessful, the town will be left with the eyesore of closed retail units with to let signs.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Policy SP8: Housing

Representation ID: 642

Received: 22/11/2016

Respondent: Steven Worley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object to SP8(e)(ii): Safeguarding of west of Stevenage is an unnecessary step. Further opportunities available in Stevenage.

Full text:

I object strongly to the proposal to remove Green Belt protection from land West of Stevenage and regard this as an unnecessary step which will inevitably open the way for an eventual expansion of Stevenage into North Herts. It staggers me that para 4.104 states that Stevenage's plan is likely to have limited development opportunities when it seems that when available sites which could be used for housing are given over to yet more retail development.