Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Search representations

Results for Mr and Mrs Michael and Susan Hewitt search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC1 Land at Duncots Close

Representation ID: 557

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Michael and Susan Hewitt

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
traffic congestion resulting from additional houses;
lack of infrastructure, e.g one shop, no post office, sewerage & drainage;
relocation of the historic and listed school;
lack of consultation; and
conflicts with the NPPF and NHDC Strategic Objectives on green belt.

Full text:

As residents in Ickleford for many years, these proposals disappoint my wife & I immensely, the historic village will be turned into a town with the 319 properties being proposed.

As anyone given thought to how this village which has won time after time, awards for best kept village, etc. would be able to cope with this development, to mention just a few, the traffic is already a major problem, and will get much worse, the village has 1 small shop, no post office, the sewage/drainage system cannot cope as it is, we have been the victims ourselves due to the aged pipe networks & pumping station, which cannot deal with the present flows let alone another 319 properties.
The historic & listed village school would appear to have to be relocated, because of the influx of additional pupils.

This proves 1 basic point, The Lack of Proper Consultation, which on its own is not Legally Compliant, not to mention coordination with neighbouring authorities, i.e. Central Bedfordshire.

Ickleford is a beautiful village, surrounded by green belt, farms, picturesque cottages, and common land, the Local Plan for sites IC1,IC2,& IC3 conflicts with the National Planning Policy framework, also with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

We strongly object to ALL sites mentioned above, for the reasons given, all the sites are NOT Sound,& Conflict with Policy or Strategic Objectives. And would urge the council to reconsider ALL the proposals.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road

Representation ID: 558

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Michael and Susan Hewitt

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
traffic congestion resulting from additional houses;
lack of infrastructure, e.g one shop, no post office, sewerage & drainage;
relocation of the historic and listed school;
lack of consultation; and
conflicts with the NPPF and NHDC Strategic Objectives on green belt.

Full text:

As residents in Ickleford for many years, these proposals disappoint my wife & I immensely, the historic village will be turned into a town with the 319 properties being proposed.

As anyone given thought to how this village which has won time after time, awards for best kept village, etc. would be able to cope with this development, to mention just a few, the traffic is already a major problem, and will get much worse, the village has 1 small shop, no post office, the sewage/drainage system cannot cope as it is, we have been the victims ourselves due to the aged pipe networks & pumping station, which cannot deal with the present flows let alone another 319 properties.
The historic & listed village school would appear to have to be relocated, because of the influx of additional pupils.

This proves 1 basic point, The Lack of Proper Consultation, which on its own is not Legally Compliant, not to mention coordination with neighbouring authorities, i.e. Central Bedfordshire.

Ickleford is a beautiful village, surrounded by green belt, farms, picturesque cottages, and common land, the Local Plan for sites IC1,IC2,& IC3 conflicts with the National Planning Policy framework, also with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

We strongly object to ALL sites mentioned above, for the reasons given, all the sites are NOT Sound,& Conflict with Policy or Strategic Objectives. And would urge the council to reconsider ALL the proposals.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC3 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 559

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Michael and Susan Hewitt

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
traffic congestion resulting from additional houses;
lack of infrastructure, e.g one shop, no post office, sewerage & drainage;
relocation of the historic and listed school;
lack of consultation; and
conflicts with the NPPF and NHDC Strategic Objectives on green belt.

Full text:

As residents in Ickleford for many years, these proposals disappoint my wife & I immensely, the historic village will be turned into a town with the 319 properties being proposed.

As anyone given thought to how this village which has won time after time, awards for best kept village, etc. would be able to cope with this development, to mention just a few, the traffic is already a major problem, and will get much worse, the village has 1 small shop, no post office, the sewage/drainage system cannot cope as it is, we have been the victims ourselves due to the aged pipe networks & pumping station, which cannot deal with the present flows let alone another 319 properties.
The historic & listed village school would appear to have to be relocated, because of the influx of additional pupils.

This proves 1 basic point, The Lack of Proper Consultation, which on its own is not Legally Compliant, not to mention coordination with neighbouring authorities, i.e. Central Bedfordshire.

Ickleford is a beautiful village, surrounded by green belt, farms, picturesque cottages, and common land, the Local Plan for sites IC1,IC2,& IC3 conflicts with the National Planning Policy framework, also with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

We strongly object to ALL sites mentioned above, for the reasons given, all the sites are NOT Sound,& Conflict with Policy or Strategic Objectives. And would urge the council to reconsider ALL the proposals.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

LS1 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 560

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Michael and Susan Hewitt

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
traffic congestion resulting from additional houses;
lack of infrastructure, e.g one shop, no post office, sewerage & drainage;
relocation of the historic and listed school;
lack of consultation; and
conflicts with the NPPF and NHDC Strategic Objectives on green belt.

Full text:

As residents in Ickleford for many years, these proposals disappoint my wife & I immensely, the historic village will be turned into a town with the 319 properties being proposed.

As anyone given thought to how this village which has won time after time, awards for best kept village, etc. would be able to cope with this development, to mention just a few, the traffic is already a major problem, and will get much worse, the village has 1 small shop, no post office, the sewage/drainage system cannot cope as it is, we have been the victims ourselves due to the aged pipe networks & pumping station, which cannot deal with the present flows let alone another 319 properties.
The historic & listed village school would appear to have to be relocated, because of the influx of additional pupils.

This proves 1 basic point, The Lack of Proper Consultation, which on its own is not Legally Compliant, not to mention coordination with neighbouring authorities, i.e. Central Bedfordshire.

Ickleford is a beautiful village, surrounded by green belt, farms, picturesque cottages, and common land, the Local Plan for sites IC1,IC2,& IC3 conflicts with the National Planning Policy framework, also with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

We strongly object to ALL sites mentioned above, for the reasons given, all the sites are NOT Sound,& Conflict with Policy or Strategic Objectives. And would urge the council to reconsider ALL the proposals.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.