Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Ms Sally Ozaydin search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC1 Land at Duncots Close

Representation ID: 553

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Sally Ozaydin

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
increased traffic pollution is contrary to NHDC policy on air quality;
proposals will not protect and enhance the historic character of the village;
development is contrary to the NHDC strategic objective on green belt; and
proposals are contrary to the NPPF.

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on several grounds, as listed below:
1) There is a conflict between NHDC policy on air quality and the increased traffic pollution that will follow as a result of development at sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - for this reason I would argue that the local plan is not sound.
2) It is NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages - how could you propose to relocate our much loved village school? To do so will tear the heart out of Ickleford village and our close community. The local plan is not sound as the impact of development at site IC3, damage to our community and the character of our village, is in conflict with NHDC policy - PROTECT and ENHANCE the historic character of villages!
3) Development on sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 is in direct conflict with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt and also conflicts with the National Policy Planning Framework - these conflicts mean that the Local Plan is not sound.
4) The Local Plan is not legally compliant regarding site IC3 as NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site - this is an outrageous omission and our community is ready to oppose this development every step of the way.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road

Representation ID: 554

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Sally Ozaydin

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
increased traffic pollution is contrary to NHDC policy on air quality;
proposals will not protect and enhance the historic character of the village;
development is contrary to the NHDC strategic objective on green belt; and
proposals are contrary to the NPPF.

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on several grounds, as listed below:
1) There is a conflict between NHDC policy on air quality and the increased traffic pollution that will follow as a result of development at sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - for this reason I would argue that the local plan is not sound.
2) It is NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages - how could you propose to relocate our much loved village school? To do so will tear the heart out of Ickleford village and our close community. The local plan is not sound as the impact of development at site IC3, damage to our community and the character of our village, is in conflict with NHDC policy - PROTECT and ENHANCE the historic character of villages!
3) Development on sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 is in direct conflict with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt and also conflicts with the National Policy Planning Framework - these conflicts mean that the Local Plan is not sound.
4) The Local Plan is not legally compliant regarding site IC3 as NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site - this is an outrageous omission and our community is ready to oppose this development every step of the way.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC3 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 555

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Sally Ozaydin

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
increased traffic pollution is contrary to NHDC policy on air quality;
proposals will not protect and enhance the historic character of the village;
development is contrary to the NHDC strategic objective on green belt;
proposals are contrary to the NPPF; and
the Local Plan is not legally compliant as there was no prior consultation on site IC3.

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on several grounds, as listed below:
1) There is a conflict between NHDC policy on air quality and the increased traffic pollution that will follow as a result of development at sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - for this reason I would argue that the local plan is not sound.
2) It is NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages - how could you propose to relocate our much loved village school? To do so will tear the heart out of Ickleford village and our close community. The local plan is not sound as the impact of development at site IC3, damage to our community and the character of our village, is in conflict with NHDC policy - PROTECT and ENHANCE the historic character of villages!
3) Development on sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 is in direct conflict with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt and also conflicts with the National Policy Planning Framework - these conflicts mean that the Local Plan is not sound.
4) The Local Plan is not legally compliant regarding site IC3 as NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site - this is an outrageous omission and our community is ready to oppose this development every step of the way.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

LS1 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 556

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Ms Sally Ozaydin

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
increased traffic pollution is contrary to NHDC policy on air quality;
proposals will not protect and enhance the historic character of the village;
development is contrary to the NHDC strategic objective on green belt; and
proposals are contrary to the NPPF.

Full text:

I am writing to you concerning the North Hertfordshire District Council Proposed Submission Local Plan. I object to sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 on several grounds, as listed below:
1) There is a conflict between NHDC policy on air quality and the increased traffic pollution that will follow as a result of development at sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - for this reason I would argue that the local plan is not sound.
2) It is NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages - how could you propose to relocate our much loved village school? To do so will tear the heart out of Ickleford village and our close community. The local plan is not sound as the impact of development at site IC3, damage to our community and the character of our village, is in conflict with NHDC policy - PROTECT and ENHANCE the historic character of villages!
3) Development on sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 is in direct conflict with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt and also conflicts with the National Policy Planning Framework - these conflicts mean that the Local Plan is not sound.
4) The Local Plan is not legally compliant regarding site IC3 as NHDC did not allow prior consultation on this site - this is an outrageous omission and our community is ready to oppose this development every step of the way.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.