Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mr A Farrow search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC1 Land at Duncots Close
Representation ID: 814
Received: 20/11/2016
Respondent: Mr A Farrow
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to IC1: Conflict with Green Belt policy and NHDC strategy, infrastructure (sewerage), lack of prior consultation, traffic.
We object to development of IC 1,IC2, 1C3, for the following reasons , the local plan is not sound because it clashes with
Green Belt Policy and NHDC strategy, also because the sewer would not cope with such a massive development , NHDC
Did not allow prior consultation on the sites. There is already far to much traffic through the village and along the A600,
especially at peak times. As for the relocation of the school, this would destroy the nature of the heart of our lovely village
of which the school is an essential part.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road
Representation ID: 815
Received: 20/11/2016
Respondent: Mr A Farrow
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to IC2: Conflict with Green Belt policy and NHDC strategy, infrastructure (sewerage), lack of prior consultation, traffic.
We object to development of IC 1,IC2, 1C3, for the following reasons , the local plan is not sound because it clashes with
Green Belt Policy and NHDC strategy, also because the sewer would not cope with such a massive development , NHDC
Did not allow prior consultation on the sites. There is already far to much traffic through the village and along the A600,
especially at peak times. As for the relocation of the school, this would destroy the nature of the heart of our lovely village
of which the school is an essential part.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
IC3 Land at Bedford Road
Representation ID: 816
Received: 20/11/2016
Respondent: Mr A Farrow
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to IC3: Conflict with Green Belt policy and NHDC strategy, infrastructure (sewerage), lack of prior consultation, traffic, impact of school relocation on village character.
We object to development of IC 1,IC2, 1C3, for the following reasons , the local plan is not sound because it clashes with
Green Belt Policy and NHDC strategy, also because the sewer would not cope with such a massive development , NHDC
Did not allow prior consultation on the sites. There is already far to much traffic through the village and along the A600,
especially at peak times. As for the relocation of the school, this would destroy the nature of the heart of our lovely village
of which the school is an essential part.
