Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Mr A Farrow search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC1 Land at Duncots Close

Representation ID: 814

Received: 20/11/2016

Respondent: Mr A Farrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC1: Conflict with Green Belt policy and NHDC strategy, infrastructure (sewerage), lack of prior consultation, traffic.

Full text:

We object to development of IC 1,IC2, 1C3, for the following reasons , the local plan is not sound because it clashes with
Green Belt Policy and NHDC strategy, also because the sewer would not cope with such a massive development , NHDC
Did not allow prior consultation on the sites. There is already far to much traffic through the village and along the A600,
especially at peak times. As for the relocation of the school, this would destroy the nature of the heart of our lovely village
of which the school is an essential part.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road

Representation ID: 815

Received: 20/11/2016

Respondent: Mr A Farrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC2: Conflict with Green Belt policy and NHDC strategy, infrastructure (sewerage), lack of prior consultation, traffic.

Full text:

We object to development of IC 1,IC2, 1C3, for the following reasons , the local plan is not sound because it clashes with
Green Belt Policy and NHDC strategy, also because the sewer would not cope with such a massive development , NHDC
Did not allow prior consultation on the sites. There is already far to much traffic through the village and along the A600,
especially at peak times. As for the relocation of the school, this would destroy the nature of the heart of our lovely village
of which the school is an essential part.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC3 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 816

Received: 20/11/2016

Respondent: Mr A Farrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to IC3: Conflict with Green Belt policy and NHDC strategy, infrastructure (sewerage), lack of prior consultation, traffic, impact of school relocation on village character.

Full text:

We object to development of IC 1,IC2, 1C3, for the following reasons , the local plan is not sound because it clashes with
Green Belt Policy and NHDC strategy, also because the sewer would not cope with such a massive development , NHDC
Did not allow prior consultation on the sites. There is already far to much traffic through the village and along the A600,
especially at peak times. As for the relocation of the school, this would destroy the nature of the heart of our lovely village
of which the school is an essential part.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.