Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Ruth McAdam search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt
Representation ID: 512
Received: 20/11/2016
Respondent: Ruth McAdam
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The plan to build on green belt is not sound, and is in conflict with national Green Belt policy (Section 9 of the NPPF). The justification for the excessive housing target that does not take proper account of Green Belt constraints is absent (NPPF para 14). The impact of individual developments on the countryside and communities including cumulative effects - for example, where there are also proposals in neighbouring Council areas is not justified. The effect of housing growth on local services and facilities including roads, schools, health services, and excessive local gravel and sand extraction.
The plan to build on green belt is not sound, and is in conflict with national Green Belt policy (Section 9 of the NPPF). The justification for the excessive housing target that does not take proper account of Green Belt constraints is absent (NPPF para 14). The impact of individual developments on the countryside and communities including cumulative effects - for example, where there are also proposals in neighbouring Council areas is not justified. The effect of housing growth on local services and facilities including roads, schools, health services, and excessive local gravel and sand extraction.
