Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Mr & Mrs Dave & Christine Stephens search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
RY2 Land north of Newmarket Road
Representation ID: 143
Received: 27/10/2016
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Dave & Christine Stephens
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to RY2: New access
We wish to object to the justification to alter the road layout at the junction of newmarket road with its junction with the a505 at the eastern side of royston. Is it intended to impose a weight limit on vehicles entering the town from this junction, and will two way traffic be able to gain access? Where exactly is it proposed to build to the south of newmarket road? And from which access point? Where will the access be sited to accomodate the proposed new developement to the north of Newmarket road? Is it anticipated that the occupants of these new developements will choose to shop in royston? if so there fitness levels will surely be tested as taking a car into town will be difficult due to a lack of affordable parking spaces! we do trust that you may review the current practise of some shoppers in the town parking in any side roads that do not have some form of restriction operating. This making life in these affected roads especially difficult, and in one in particular a cul de sac with no hammerhead or turning point.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Royston
Representation ID: 237
Received: 27/10/2016
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Dave & Christine Stephens
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to new access into town and parking provision
We wish to object to the justification to alter the road layout at the junction of newmarket road with its junction with the a505 at the eastern side of royston. Is it intended to impose a weight limit on vehicles entering the town from this junction, and will two way traffic be able to gain access? Where exactly is it proposed to build to the south of newmarket road? And from which access point? Where will the access be sited to accomodate the proposed new developement to the north of Newmarket road? Is it anticipated that the occupants of these new developements will choose to shop in royston? if so there fitness levels will surely be tested as taking a car into town will be difficult due to a lack of affordable parking spaces! we do trust that you may review the current practise of some shoppers in the town parking in any side roads that do not have some form of restriction operating. This making life in these affected roads especially difficult, and in one in particular a cul de sac with no hammerhead or turning point.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
RY10 Land south of Newmarket Road
Representation ID: 239
Received: 27/10/2016
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Dave & Christine Stephens
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to RY10: Access
We wish to object to the justification to alter the road layout at the junction of newmarket road with its junction with the a505 at the eastern side of royston. Is it intended to impose a weight limit on vehicles entering the town from this junction, and will two way traffic be able to gain access? Where exactly is it proposed to build to the south of newmarket road? And from which access point? Where will the access be sited to accomodate the proposed new developement to the north of Newmarket road? Is it anticipated that the occupants of these new developements will choose to shop in royston? if so there fitness levels will surely be tested as taking a car into town will be difficult due to a lack of affordable parking spaces! we do trust that you may review the current practise of some shoppers in the town parking in any side roads that do not have some form of restriction operating. This making life in these affected roads especially difficult, and in one in particular a cul de sac with no hammerhead or turning point.