Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Home Builders Federation Ltd search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 4343
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP8: calculation of objectively assessed needs, use of lower migration trends, migration assumptions from London, early review clause required, deliverability of allocations from non-strategic sites, windfall allowance not justified, five-year land supply
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt
Representation ID: 5517
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP5: Rural Area policy excessively restrictive, impact upon housing delivery
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP7: Infrastructure Requirements and Developer Contributions
Representation ID: 5518
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP7: Greater clarity between CIL and s106 required, clause (b) unlawful, infrastructure not always responsibility of applicant to deliver, meaning of "stringent approach" unclear
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy HS5: Accessible and adaptable housing
Representation ID: 5519
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to HS5: Viability has been assessed independently of other factors
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy HS2: Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 5520
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Home Builders Federation Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to HS2: Relationship with CIL / s106 unclear in viability terms, policy not sufficiently precise/is unclear at i), ii) and iii), clause c unenforceable, para 8.15 and proposed use of supplementary guidance contrary to NPPF.
See attachment