Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 4258

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
loss of green belt and countryside;
proposed allocations will result in encroachment of development into the countryside; and
contrary to national guidance in the NPPF.

Object

Representation ID: 4259

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
to the overall housing requirement for the District; and
the application of the OAN to the provision of housing within the District and in particular Codicote.

Object

Representation ID: 4260

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
to the proposed allocations and the way in which those have been included within the Local Plan without evidence of sustainability and suitability; and
Codicote is an unsustainable location for the number of dwellings proposed, e.g lack of public transport, employment opportunities, healthcare and education facilities, and impact on infrastructure .

Object

Representation ID: 4261

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
the broadbrush requirement for affordable housing for all sites over 25 dwellings;
policy does not make provision for ensuring affordable housing is offered to Codicote residents first.

Object

Representation ID: 4262

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
visual impact;
access and impact on Cowards Lane; and
impact on wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 4288

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
loss of employment site in the village; and
visual impact from the B565.

Object

Representation ID: 4289

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
visual impact;
impact on footpath users and links to the open countryside; and
flooding on the access to the site.

Object

Representation ID: 4290

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
visual impact from the south western part of the site;
impact of the new access;
loss of trees;
impact on users of public footpaths;
disconnection of the school from the land to the south by public footpath;
ability of the school to expand;
impact on residential amenity of existing residents due to difference in levels; and
potential merging of village with Codicote Bottom.
potential impact on wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 4303

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Save Rural Codicote

Agent: Hutchinsons

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object on the following grounds:
impact on living conditions of the adjacent quarry;
lack of safe access to the site with heavy traffic to the quarry;
location of all pitches for the District in one location; and
drainage issues.