Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Bloor Homes South Midlands search
New searchSupport
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
3 Spatial Strategy and Spatial Vision
Representation ID: 4212
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Support: Provision of coherent vision and broad strategy
See attached
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP2: Settlement Hierarchy
Representation ID: 4213
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Support SP2: Directing growth to locations within or adjoining principal towns, identification of Cockernhoe as Cat A village
See attached
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP5: Countryside and Green Belt
Representation ID: 4214
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Support SP5: Sound, justified and effective in enabling strategic development
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP7: Infrastructure Requirements and Developer Contributions
Representation ID: 4215
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP7: Literal interpretation of SP7(a)(i)(bullet point 4) could place unachievable burden on development, clause c could place unnecessary requirements on applications and lead to lengthy delay, clause d reference to "any" guidance, definition of "stringent approach" unclear.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP8: Housing
Representation ID: 4216
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP8: unclear where 200 units in Luton HMA will be delivered, 40% affordable housing not viable East of Luton, consider Luton affordable housing targets for consistency.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy T1: Assessment of transport matters
Representation ID: 4218
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to T1(a): Literal interpretation places unrealistic requirement on new development, inconsistent with NPPF test
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy HS2: Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 4219
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to HS2: 40% affordable housing not viable East of Luton, consider Luton affordable housing targets for consistency, targets inconsistent with SP8
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy NE8: Sustainable Drainage Systems
Representation ID: 4220
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to NE8: Literal application of (a) requires living roofs on all development, (c) should include reference to feasibility and viability, (d) not justifiable
See attached
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP6: Sustainable Transport
Representation ID: 4221
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Support SP6: Sound, justified and consistent with national policy
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP19: Sites EL1, EL2 and EL3 - East of Luton
Representation ID: 4223
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to SP19: Generally support as promoter, object to clause (k)(i) Stubbocks Wood outside allocation boundary, no direct development effects.
See attached