North Hertfordshire District Council

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Back to document

Search representations

Results for Mr Stuart Lindsey search

New search

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC1 Land at Duncots Close

Representation ID: 2356

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Stuart Lindsey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
Building on the green belt;
Sewerage and flooding;
Lack of proper consultation;
Flawed traffic modelling;
Air quality; and
Relocation of the village school.

Full text:

I would like to make the following comments regarding the North Herts Local Plan.

my objections concern sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1

1. Building on Green Belt
For sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-Conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework
-Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

2. Sewerage & Flooding
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- Evidence shows that the main sewer cannot cope with current demand; IC1 and IC3 will add to this burden.
-Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new develpoments.

3, Lack of proper consultation
For sites IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC did not allow prior consultation on these sites

4 Traffic
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire, and conflict with NHDC policy on transport.

5 Air quality
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-increased air pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.

6 Relocation of the village School
For sites IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- the consequent impact on the village conflicts with NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages.

7. No coordination with neighbouring authorities
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC have not accounted for any impact associated with the CentraL Bedfordshire local plan.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC2 Burford Grange, Bedford Road

Representation ID: 2357

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Stuart Lindsey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
Building on the green belt;
Sewerage and flooding;
Lack of proper consultation;
Flawed traffic modelling;
Air quality; and
Relocation of the village school.

Full text:

I would like to make the following comments regarding the North Herts Local Plan.

my objections concern sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1

1. Building on Green Belt
For sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-Conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework
-Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

2. Sewerage & Flooding
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- Evidence shows that the main sewer cannot cope with current demand; IC1 and IC3 will add to this burden.
-Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new develpoments.

3, Lack of proper consultation
For sites IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC did not allow prior consultation on these sites

4 Traffic
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire, and conflict with NHDC policy on transport.

5 Air quality
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-increased air pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.

6 Relocation of the village School
For sites IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- the consequent impact on the village conflicts with NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages.

7. No coordination with neighbouring authorities
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC have not accounted for any impact associated with the CentraL Bedfordshire local plan.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

IC3 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 2358

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Stuart Lindsey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
Building on the green belt;
Sewerage and flooding;
Lack of proper consultation;
Flawed traffic modelling;
Air quality; and
Relocation of the village school.

Full text:

I would like to make the following comments regarding the North Herts Local Plan.

my objections concern sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1

1. Building on Green Belt
For sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-Conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework
-Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

2. Sewerage & Flooding
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- Evidence shows that the main sewer cannot cope with current demand; IC1 and IC3 will add to this burden.
-Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new develpoments.

3, Lack of proper consultation
For sites IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC did not allow prior consultation on these sites

4 Traffic
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire, and conflict with NHDC policy on transport.

5 Air quality
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-increased air pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.

6 Relocation of the village School
For sites IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- the consequent impact on the village conflicts with NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages.

7. No coordination with neighbouring authorities
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC have not accounted for any impact associated with the CentraL Bedfordshire local plan.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

LS1 Land at Bedford Road

Representation ID: 2359

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Stuart Lindsey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
Building on the green belt;
Sewerage and flooding;
Lack of proper consultation;
Flawed traffic modelling;
Air quality;
Relocation of the village school; and
No coordination with neighbouring authorities.

Full text:

I would like to make the following comments regarding the North Herts Local Plan.

my objections concern sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1

1. Building on Green Belt
For sites IC1, IC2 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-Conflicts with National Planning Policy Framework
-Conflicts with NHDC Strategic Objectives on Green Belt.

2. Sewerage & Flooding
For sites IC1 and IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- Evidence shows that the main sewer cannot cope with current demand; IC1 and IC3 will add to this burden.
-Conflicts with NHDC policies not to develop in areas prone to flooding, and to reduce the risk of flooding from new develpoments.

3, Lack of proper consultation
For sites IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC did not allow prior consultation on these sites

4 Traffic
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC modelling is flawed as it does not account for increased traffic from Central Bedfordshire, and conflict with NHDC policy on transport.

5 Air quality
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
-increased air pollution conflicts with NHDC policy on air quality.

6 Relocation of the village School
For sites IC3 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- the consequent impact on the village conflicts with NHDC policy to protect and enhance the historic character of villages.

7. No coordination with neighbouring authorities
For sites IC1, IC2, IC3 and LS1 - the local plan is 'Not Sound' for the following reasons:
- NHDC have not accounted for any impact associated with the CentraL Bedfordshire local plan.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.