Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Search representations
Results for Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG) search
New searchObject
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP10: Healthy Communities
Representation ID: 5988
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support:
-pleased to see the protection given to existing community facilities in SP10f.andHC1
Object:
-no specific Development Management Policy statements on physical and green infrastructure and rights of way to underpin SP10 f., consistent with the requirements of the NPPF para 69 and 75
-SP10 para4.130 requirements for open space provision are set out in the detailed policy-not bourne out of the policy statement or the explanatory notes for policy HC1
Object:
No vision statement directly relates to SP10,particularly the role in this policy in promoting healthy communities by ensuring the adequate provision of infrastructure to facilitate cycling and walking
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Section One - Introduction and Context
Representation ID: 5989
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Proposed change to Glossary - see below,
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP6: Sustainable Transport
Representation ID: 5992
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object:
Strategic Objective ECON7 is comparatively weakly supported by Strategic Policies SP6 c,d and g-then further limited to larger developments in T1dii.
Two serious deficiencies in evidence base:
-no clear indication that proposed junction modifications will solve traffic problems resulting from cumulative effect of housing development-IDP states action needs to be taken to cope with background growth in traffic without additional local plan growth.
-no assessment of alternative approaches to environmentally damaging traffic engineering at junctions.
-SP6c.&SP6d.too weak. Latter with regard tobe considered best alternative,not likely to be effective
Site visit recommended-station,A505 under-bridge access to station from east
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy T1: Assessment of transport matters
Representation ID: 5993
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object:
Strategic Objective ECON7 is comparatively weakly support by Strategic Policies SP6 c, d and g - then further limited to larger developments in T1dii.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy NE1: Landscape
Representation ID: 5994
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Clarification would be helpful in relation to the use of the word 'considered' in NE1 d.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy NE9: Water quality and environment
Representation ID: 5995
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Clarification would be helpful in relation to the use of 'close to' in NE9 c.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
11 Natural Environment
Representation ID: 5996
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The government's technical standards for water efficiency are mentioned in SP9 d. and a cross reference to this policy should appear under the heading Natural Environment.
Whilst pleased to see that the unrealistic water consumption target of 105 litres per day per person has been removed, there is no policy in this section that supports the intention of Strategic Objective ENV5 to reduce water consumption.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
12 Historic Environment
Representation ID: 5998
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support:
- endorses conclusion that the Historic Environment makes a 'strong positive contribution to North Hertfordshire' and supports fuller consideration given to the issue in the current draft and those Strategic Objectives that support this approach.
Object:
- would benefit from closer editing and better cross referencing - Historic Environment polices also central to those in Design, Countryside and Green Belt amongst others. A tighter, better linked, text would improve the workability, impact and accessibility of the Plan.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy SP13: Historic Environment
Representation ID: 6000
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
- suggest that much better use be made of cost-effective sources of 'local knowledge'
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Policy HE1: Designated Heritage Assets
Representation ID: 6001
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
- suggest that much better use be made of cost-effective sources of 'local knowledge'
See attachment